|
 |
Content d'être un gars
Glad to be a
guy
 |
|
Lundi, le 2 avril 2007
Monday, April 2 2007 |
|
Hier |
Demain |
|
_small.jpg)
|
Le confort et la dissidence
|
Le spectre de la droite
|
Les nouveaux visages de l'ADQ
|
Being the agitator that I
am, I brought up the issue of Men's Rights in one of my classes when the
opportunity presented itself. I was somewhat surprised by the response I got
from the instructor and the rest of the class. To my shock, the female
instructor and all the women in the class that spoke up agreed that men have
been getting short-changed by society.
I was amazed when a young woman commented that
women can't claim to be equal when they are held to a lower standard. She
referred to the lower standards for female police officers and to the
unnecessary safety risk faced by the pubic in having unqualified officers
protect us. Another young woman said she learned in her Women's Studies class
that some men join hate groups because they have been unjustly deprived of a
political voice. The hate groups she referenced where Neonazis and the KKK,
not MRAs.
Either women have lost the backbone to stand up
for the Feminist hate movement, or Feminism is losing steam. The only
dissenting opinion came from a mangina. Sadly, he and I were the only ones in
the class with a Y chromosome willing to comment on an issue of such great
importance to men. Although I realize that most of the women speaking up would
be unwilling in practice to give up their unearned privileges, it's good to
know that many women support us in principle. Actions speak louder than words
though, but I may drop in on a Women's Studies class to find out what the hell
is going on. However, I intend to follow the example of Odysseus, lest I dash
myself on the rocks to the Siren's tune of true equality.
|
 "Le
Council on Foreigns Relations est la branche américaine d'une société qui
origine d'Angleterre et qui croit que les limites nationales devraient être
abolies, et un règne mondial unique établi."
Barry Goldwater (1909-1998), élu 5 fois Sénateur de l'Arizona
|
 Les
Franc-maçons du Québec
 Le
13 janvier 1946 Louis Saint-Laurent, le premier ministre du Canada, s'adresse
à la première assemblée générale des Nations unies pour proposer l'institution
d'un gouvernement mondial
Le
20 décembre 2006, Jean-Claude Turcotte, l'archevêque du diocèses de Montréal
parle d'instituer un gouvernement mondial
|
 Any
Dad
|
Le féminisme vu par les dragueurs
Betaising The Alpha Male - Process Described
from Franco Seduction Blog (used with permission)
Although I don't embrace the Pick Up Artist (PUA) lifestyle, I think they
have a perspective on women that is worth looking at. If sport fucking is
your thing, there's definitely a lot of good stuff out there to perfect your
art. While killing time, I read some interesting things on
Franco's blog.
I see a lot of parallels in his description of women acting individually and
what's going on in the Feminist nations of the world in aggregate,
particularly this idea of Betaising (Beta-ising if it helps you read it).
All the tests a woman runs on men are meant to achieve only one purpose: to
screen out weaker males and get for herself the Alpha dominant male. This is
because this man will be the best protection for her and her children, the
carrier of the best genes.
When she achieves her purpose: to shoot down weaker males and get for her
the Alpha male a process starts. It is the Process of Betaising the Alpha
Male.
This is why women love "jerks". Human beings are social creatures, complete
with a social hierarchy that corresponds with a dominance hierarchy in the
animal kingdom. A jerk is higher in the dominance hierarchy than a wimp that
takes abuse like a little bitch. I won't begrudge women the right to choose
men the way that's ingrained in their instincts. They have to live with
those choices though. I can't blame them. Even as a bachelor for life, I
still stop to admire a choice piece of ass from time to time.
So what is the Process of Betaising? It is a process starting soon after the
woman has shoot down weaker males and her relationship with an Alpha male
starts.
Well guys the truth is that this process lasts forever because women have in
their deeper instincts:
- The need to test from times to times is their own man still Alpha.
- At the same time the need to change him into beta, to make sure he will be
the only one to them.
This process is extremely dangerous for the relationship and one of the most
dangerous killers of attraction from the woman if the man does not know how
to properly deal with it.
Franco also describes how once a woman succeeds in making a man weaker, she
will continue and not let up. Even when her man is subservient to her, she
will continue to push him further. The first time I read this, I found
myself thinking that this sounds a lot like Feminism. Men used to dominate
every aspect of our society, everything from politics to the household.
Feminism challenged the status quo of male dominance. Even after women
achieved equality decades ago (personally I think that happened sometime in
the first half of the 20th century), they continued their offensive against
men. Is it possible that Feminism is the collective equivalent of Betaising?
I think it is.
[I]f the man, in a way, agrees to be betaised by her she will lose any
attraction for him. So the paradox is: what a woman really wants in the
process of betaising is exactly the contrary of what she is really doing to
him.
This explains why the mangina approach is a failure with women. It also
explains why some women continue on the destructive path of Feminism, even
when it is also doing harm to women in the process. Feminism might just be
another stupid test that women are giving to men. Our fathers and
grandfathers failed, and the results for our society have been disastrous.
However, this "test" is going to backfire on women in more ways than the
suffering of the glut of spinster cat-fanciers. When the balance of equality
is restored, I don't think women will ever have it as good as they've had it
before.
Now there is a danger for the woman in this process: how could she find
sexually attractive a man who agrees to be made weaker???
He would not be anymore a Man to her!
So the job of the man in the relationship is to understand that when his
woman tries to make him weaker she must be dealt with by not giving her that
possibility, not even once, otherwise she will lose sexual attraction and
the relationship will deteriorate.
I think this describes the plight of manginas perfectly.
Now let´s analyze how the process of betaising develops itself:
- Repeating Tests Cyclically
Experts of Pickup and Seduction know that every woman tests men at the
beginning of the Mating Dance to screen for the Alpha male.
A less knows phenomenon is that a woman repeats her tests periodically in
the relationship with her Alpha male. This is to make sure is that her man
is still Alpha. At the same time this is also a way to control him. Being
tested constantly is very tough and it drains energy.
If Feminism is analogous to Betaising, then this is a future word of
warning. We can't let our guard down once we achieve the MRA dream. If this
is an innate quality of women, future MRA's will have to guard the gains we
make jealously or risk ending up back in the same mess we are in now.
Which are the most common tests?
- Manipulation.
Manipulation has a very bad reputation in male world but it is in woman´s
world a widespread form of communication, which is not felt by women as
"bad". When a woman manipulates she feel that she is more "communicating"
than doing something wrong. Anyway in the deeper of her instincts a woman
knows that if her man is easily manipulated by her, he is surely not Alpha
or if he was Alpha now he is not powerful anymore.
Unfortunately, the majority of men fail this test. The mangina is the
epitome of this failure. Women have manipulated manginas into doing much of
their dirty work for them. It's kind of sad when the Feminists are able to
get manginas in power to continue to make life miserable for their fellow
man. It's truly pathetic when I look up a Congressman online and read all
about how he is falling over himself trying to make life better for women at
the expense of men.
- Inducing Feelings of Guilt.
A man who takes too easily the role of the "guilty one" is not Alpha. Women
know this instinctively. If he asks too easily for forgiveness for his
existence he is not Alpha: he is the most beta of the men!
Real Alpha males believe in themselves and they are more prone to do
decisions, lead and act, instead of being masochists and suffer the torture
of the eternal guilt.
But an Alpha male without guilt can easily leave for war, hunting and maybe
other women.
So one of the most widespread mean women use to betaise their men is to
slowly have him into the frame: "You are the guilty one as default!"
Does this remind anyone else of the "all men are rapists" lie? What about "1
in 4 women will be raped in their lifetimes"? How about "men need to stop
domestic violence"? Again, I'm also reminded of the mangina that constantly
apologizes for being a man.
- Be Maternal To Him.
Anyway many women will try all what they can to be maternal to their men at
different degrees! Why? Because the more he needs them the more they will
control him.
Women know instinctively that need = power !
A real Alpha man reacts instinctively against this! He will never agree to
get used to a too pleasant treatment, because he is used to survive in the
forest or in war by eating - at need - even small, ugly animals!
Unfortunately for women, men are going their own way and not looking back.
We don't need women anymore. Men are cooking their own food, cleaning their
own domiciles, and doing their own laundry. I think that when women claim
men are not able to handle a "strong woman" or try to hold a woman back,
they are really projecting their own mental state and inadequacies.
- Lack Of Respect.
In the deep of her instincts a woman knows that if a guy does not react to
her lack of respect he is not
Alpha.
We see this test everyday in the MRA world. It's called shaming language.
There's no need to put up with a woman's shit. It's just a pathetic attempt
to manipulate men. Thankfully, I have yet to see an MRA that doesn't
recognize shaming language for what it is.
- Important warning.
An increasing number of women in industrialized countries started to act
differently in regard to this process. They choose from the beginning of the
relationship guys who are still unsure and not Alpha deliberately with the
purpose to have children. This will not work on the longer-term and you will
pay for it later on if you agree to this kind of arrangement.
Although I read the PUA sites occasionally, this is the first time I've seen
anything like it from the PUA's. We in the MRA community recognize this as
the desperate woman with a ticking biological clock and baby rabies. It's
good to see PUA's passing on the good word.
Franco's views on women gives me pause and has forced me to think through my
views on the battle of the sexes a second time. If this process of Betaising
is real and is unconsciously driven by instinct, and if it is connected to
Feminism, where does that leave Men's Rights? The whole idea seems to make
sense and would explain a lot about Feminism. But it doesn't leave much room
for the dream of equality. True equality can't exist if half the population
is trying consciously or not to undermine it.
Source:
http://ulrich-inferno.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
Avril le mois des grosses couennes
|
Yves Boisvert: De causes et d'autres
|
Presumption of Equal Shared Parenting After Divorce
|
Amour
ou drogue qui change la vie... ??
|
L'Illusion Tranquille sera
présenté à Canal D ce dimanche 1er Avril à 19h.
À NE PAS MANQUER !
http://www.lillusiontranquille.com/
|
HELP US COMMEMORATE INTERNATIONAL PARENTAL ALIENATION
AWARENESS DAY-APRIL 25TH
The loss of a loving parent-child relationship is painful
and destructive to everyone.
Parental Alienation behaviors are behaviors done by a 3rd
party, which interfere with the normal parent-child relationship. These
behaviors may be done by the other parent, extended family, courts, or
social services. They may include such behaviors as speaking negatively to
or about a parent in front of the child, interfering with communication and
visitation, and sharing inappropriate information with the child.
We advocate awareness of such behaviors, and the right of
every child to love and be loved by both parents.
To accomplish this and bring to attention those who have it
within their power to make positive changes, we must be NOTICED.
Parental Alienation Awareness Day, April 25th, is coming up
soon. This year, we are asking for international participation in planning
some sort of event to commemorate April 25th. We are asking individuals
and organizations to help us commemorate this day and provide awareness of
Parental Alienation and Hostile Aggressive Parenting. If you are planning
an event for April 25th, local or international, please share with us via
the website at
events@parental- alienation- awareness. com
Last year, there were webinars, media events, quiltmakings,
programs, flyer distributions, and letter writing campaigns to the United
Nations Human Rights Commission, as well as to local, state, and national
legislators, human rights organizations, and government officials.
.http://www. parental- alienation- awareness. com/worldevents. asp Many of
these letters bore the face of a parent, or a child victim of parental
alienation, or contained a stamp with their photos:
www.stamps.com
,
www.canadapost. ca.
In the States, we are organizing 2 events-A Governors
campaign in the hopes that governors will issue a Proclamation declaring
April 25th as Parental Alienation Awareness Day on a state-wide level, and
a conference featuring renown author, researcher, and speaker, Dr. Stephen
Ceci. Dr. Ceci will be joined by numerous other prominent professionals in
the fields of child abuse, parental abductions, false sexual allegations,
and Parental Alienation.
http://www.parental -alienation- awareness.
com/workshop2007 .asp
THINGS YOU CAN DO:
-
Write letters to the Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights-Committee on the Rights of the
Child at:
www.unhchr.ch/ html/menu2/ 2/chrintro. htm
,
Office of the United Nations
Louise Arbour, High Commissioner for Human Rights
Palais Wilson
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Tel: (41 22) 917 90 00
FAX: (41 22) 917 9011
e-mail:
webadmin.hchr@ unog.ch
telling your stories, and sending pictures of your
"missing" children.
The Human Rights Commission of the UN allows for
complaints of violations via its 1503 petition procedure. A petition has
been prepared entitled, "In the Interests of Children". We urge you to read
and sign the petition at: www.un1503petition. com .Communications regarding
the petition may be directed to:
webmaster@un1503pet ition.com
This year PAAO has adopted the tulip as the symbol of our
children. Plant a tulip to show your steadfast love for our children and
your hope for a speedy reunification. If tulips are not available, then
plant a hope tree, or garden.
Help us with our Governors campaign to have Parental
Alienation recognized on a state-wide level
Send letters and provide brochures and flyers to
legislators, social service, and legal personnel telling our stories, asking
for their support, and including pictures of our children.
Contact media and make them aware that it is Parental
Alienation Awareness Day
Inform school personnel, youth leaders, clergy, Scout
leaders, coaches, about Parental Alienation, via distributing flyers and our
brochure, and directing them to www.parental- alienation- awareness. com
Attend
our workshop
on April 14-15 with outstanding experts in the fields of child abductions,
false sexual allegations, and parental alienation.
CHECK
www.parental- alienation- awareness. com
OFTEN FOR MORE SUGGESTIONS.
We hope that everyone will participate, in some way, to
commemorate April 25th, International Parental Alienation Awareness Day and
the right of every child to give and receive all of the love they deserve.
|
Les dessous de l'anti-racisme...
Ils
sont plein de bons conseils à distiller sans modération ces immigrés engagés
dans la lutte contre le racisme... mot qui à leurs yeux ne s'applique qu'aux
visages pâles.
Une fois de plus, se méfier des moralisateurs, surtout lorsqu'ils prônent la
tolérance et le respect, surtout lorsque ces moralisateurs en tirent un
profit direct. Leur morale ne s'applique jamais à eux-mêmes, au contraire.
L'anti-racisme est la face cachée du racisme anti-blanc.
 Sida
: le Camerounais qui semait la mort
14 janvier 2007
La Pologne découvre avec effroi la face cachée de Simon Mol. Figure
emblématique de la lutte pour les droits des immigrés à Varsovie, il est
accusé de propagation du Vih.
Simon Mol, 33 ans, journaliste et poète d�origine camerounaise réfugié en
Pologne, était devenu une personnalité symbole de la communauté noire de
Varsovie. Il a pourtant été arrêté le 5 janvier, pour propagation du Sida.
Quatre Polonaises [de souche]
accusent cet anglophone né à Buea, dans le Sud-Ouest du Cameroun, de leur
avoir � sciemment transmis � le Vih. Mais le parquet de Varsovie estime que
le nombre de personnes infectées pourrait s�avérer bien plus important.
[...]
Arrivé en Pologne en 1999 en provenance du Ghana, Simon Moleke Njie, de son
vrai nom, est passé à tabac par un groupe de Skinheads néofascistes et
xénophobes en 2001. L�événement fait naître sa vocation pour la lutte
antiraciste, qui va occuper une partie de son activité débordante. En 2002,
il organise une campagne visant à bouter le racisme hors des stades, où ce
phénomène ainsi que celui de l�antisémitisme prospèrent comme le gazon du
terrain. Les tribunes sont pleines de hooligans affiliés au parti fasciste
National revival of poland (NOP). L�engagement de Simon Mol lui vaut en 2003
d�être désigné � Antiraciste de l�année � par le Nigdy Wiecej (� Plus jamais
ça �), le Sos racisme polonais.
Un activiste anti-raciste poursuivi pour
racisme
15 mars 2007
Sheffield, Angleterre. Un activiste anti-raciste noir qui avait notamment
publié des photos montrant un policier en train de frapper une femme métisse
devant une boîte de nuit, a été lui-même poursuivi pour injures raciales à
l'encontre de deux policiers affectés aux contraventions.
Prenant la parole pour sa défense, Johnson dira que son but était de « leur
faire comprendre la situation. Ils étaient les deux seuls blancs au milieu
d'un quartier majoritairement noir et étaient vus comme une source
d'oppression. »
|
|
Tetu
Gendron Republique du Plateau 2
|
|
Bonjour Madame Bazzo,
En référence à votre prochaine
émission:
La République du
Plateau prend-t-elle trop de place au Québec?
http://www.telequebec.tv/ilvayavoirdusport/html_e01/C_debate_02.html
Lorsque nous parlons du
Plateau faudrait préciser;
Parlons-nous
seulement du Plateau ou des femmes et hommes
influents, progressistes et full cash vivant
dans quelques régions centrales du 514 ---» les fameux
Plateau/Rosemont-et-centre-Sud-du-Qc-Solidaire-avec-l'argent-des-autres,
l'Outremont-des-bien-pensants-et-des-arrivistes-suiveux-des-poteaux-Liberals,
Le
Milend-des-petits-parvenus-qui-revent-de-pouvoir-se-payer-une-place-à-Outremont-ou-sur-le-Plateau,
l'Ile-des-vieilles-Soeurs-frustrées (sauf vous ),
le St-Lambert-BCBG-bien-pensant, ou le
Westmont-de-la-vieille-bourgeoisie-anglo-saxonne-tout-aussi-bien-pensante
?
J'exagère, mais à peine.
Falardeau sors de ce corps.
Qui est capable de faire ce que
Mario ROY décrit dans La Presse ?
"Jadis, on disait qu'un anglophone pouvait
passer sa vie dans la métropole sans jamais avoir à prononcer un mot de
français. Aujourd'hui, à la condition d'évoluer dans certains milieux, on peut
facilement arriver à ne jamais être confronté aux véritables humeurs
populaires.
Ces milieux ne
fréquentent pas que les mêmes officines, mais aussi les mêmes quartiers et les
mêmes loisirs, les mêmes philosophes et les mêmes cafetiers. Surtout, ces «analystes
du système» (pour paraphraser le concept de l'essayiste américain Jeremy Rifkin)
accaparent la quasi-totalité de l'espace réservé à la parole publique.
En gros, il s'agit de ceux
oeuvrant dans les industries du savoir et de la communication. De ceux ayant,
par la nature de leur métier ou leur niveau dans la hiérarchie, le pouvoir de
fabriquer et de faire circuler des idées ainsi que de façonner des courants
sociaux et des politiques.
Or, depuis la Révolution tranquille, a régné dans ces milieux la conviction
inébranlable que la boussole du progrès ne peut indiquer qu'une seule direction
à l'exclusion de toutes les autres... ce relevé de cap traçant une route étroite
- souverainiste, étatiste et social-démocrate ET PROGRESSISTE et FÉMINISTE (COMMENTAIRE
PERSO) à la mode classique - délimitée une fois pour toutes dans les années
60 et hors de laquelle on ne trouve que barbarie.
C'était confortable tant que le peuple - celui dont nous disposons...- semblait
marcher, par monts et par vaux, à peu près dans la même direction.
Ça l'est moins, visiblement, lorsqu'il inscrit sa dissidence."
http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20070329/CPOPINIONS/703290679/6053/CPOPINIONS
|
Media
et islamisation rampante
|
The Difference Between
Men and Women
by Dave Barry
Let's say a guy named Fred is attracted to a woman named
Martha. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time.
A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves.
They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of
them is seeing anybody else.
And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Martha,
and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: "Do you realize that, as of
tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months?"
And then, there is silence in the car. To Martha, it seems like a very loud
silence. She thinks to herself: I wonder if it bothers him that I said that.
Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm
trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't
sure of.
And Fred is thinking: Gosh. Six months. And Martha is thinking: But, hey, I'm
not so sure I want this kind of relationship either. Sometimes I wish I had a
little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to
keep going the way we are, moving steadily towards, I mean, where are we
going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy?
Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together?
Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person?
And Fred is thinking: ...so that means it was...let's see...February when we
started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which
means...lemme check the odometer...Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change
here. And Martha is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm
reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more
intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed - even before I sensed it -
that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so
reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being
rejected.
And Fred is thinking: And I'm gonna have them look at the transmission again.
I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they
better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather?
It's 87 degrees out, and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I
paid those incompetent thieves $600.
And Martha is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry, too.
I feel so guilty, putting him through this, but I can't help the way I feel.
I'm just not sure.
And Fred is thinking: They'll probably say it's only a 90-day
warranty...scumballs.And Martha is thinking: Maybe I'm just too idealistic,
waiting for a knight to come riding up on his white horse, when I'm sitting
right next to a perfectly good person, a person I enjoy being with, a person I
truly do care about, a person who seems to truly care about me. A person who
is in pain because of my self-centered, schoolgirl romantic fantasy.
And Fred is thinking: Warranty? They want a warranty? I'll give them a
warranty. I'll take their warranty and stick it right up their...
"Fred," Martha says aloud. "What?" says Fred, startled.
"Please don't torture yourself like this," she says, her eyes beginning to
brim with tears. "Maybe I should never have...oh dear, I feel so..."(She
breaks down, sobbing.)
"What?" says Fred.
"I'm such a fool," Martha sobs. "I mean, I know there's no knight. I really
know that. It's silly. There's no knight, and there's no horse."
"There's no horse?" says Fred.
"You think I'm a fool, don't you?" Martha says.
"No!" says Fred, glad to finally know the correct answer.
"It's just that...it's that I...I need some time," Martha says.
(There is a 15-second pause while Fred, thinking as fast as he can, tries to
come up with a safe response. Finally he comes up with one that he thinks
might work.)
"Yes," he says. (Martha, deeply moved, touches his hand.)
"Oh, Fred, do you really feel that way?" she says.
"What way?" says Fred.
"That way about time," says Martha.
"Oh," says Fred. "Yes." (Martha turns to face him and gazes deeply into his
eyes, causing him to become very nervous about what she might say next,
especially if it involves a horse. At last she speaks.)
"Thank you, Fred," she says.
"Thank you," says Fred. Then he takes her home, and she lies on her bed, a
conflicted, tortured soul, and weeps until dawn, whereas when Fred gets back
to his place, he opens a bag of Doritos, turns on the TV, and immediately
becomes deeply involved in a rerun of a college basketball game between two
South Dakota junior colleges that he has never heard of. A tiny voice in the
far recesses of his mind tells him that something major was going on back
there in the car, but he is pretty sure there is no way he would ever
understand what, and so he figures it's better if he doesn't think about it.
They will continue to discuss this subject, off and on, for weeks, maybe
months, never reaching any definite conclusions, but never getting bored with
it either.
Meanwhile, Fred, while playing racquetball one day with a mutual friend of his
and Martha's, will pause just before serving, frown, and say: "Norm, did
Martha ever own a horse?"
And that's the difference between men and women.
|
L'attaque contre le clergé
|
Martineau et le clergé « progressiste »
Pas pire en effet le texte de Martineau !
Sauf qu’il ne critique pas l’idéologie « progressiste »
(socialiste, féministe et marxiste culturelle) qui domine le Québec et
l’État québécois parce que c’est aussi l’idéologie de la classe des
intellectuels « progressistes » montréalais, dont fait Martineau parti.
Les intellectuels de la République populaire de Plateau
Mont-Royal, en quelque sorte.
Martineau fait parti du clergé « progressiste » qu’il
prétend critiquer. Il est en effet une de ces plus brillantes stars ces
temps-ci.
Mario Dumont n’est pas un révolutionnaire.
Mais son élection vient d’entrouvrir des possibilités de
réels progrès : PLUS de liberté individuelle et économique et MOINS d’État
et de socialisme.
Gerard Levesque
|
Le retour du refoulé
|
"Forget China, India and
the internet: economic growth is driven by women".
The Economist, April 2006
-It is alarming as this article states
that the World Bank
is considering it a reasonable thing to support women for a intelligent
economic policy( actions planned for years 2007 -2010).
|
Histoire & sciences sociales
Période Contemporaine
Les femmes du IIIe Reich
de Anna-Maria Sigmund
JC Lattès 2004
ISBN : 2-7096-2541-5
L'auteur du compte rendu : agrégé d�histoire, Nicolas Plagne est un ancien
élève de l�Ecole Normale Supérieure. Il a fait des études d�histoire et de
philosophie. Après avoir été assistant à l�Institut national des langues et
civilisations orientales, il enseigne dans un lycée de la région rouennaise et
finit de rédiger une thèse consacrée à l�histoire des polémiques autour des
origines de l�Etat russe.
Huit femmes du premier cercle
Comme Les Femmes d�Hitler de Knopp, Les Femmes du IIIème Reich
(en allemand, Die Frauen der Nazis - «les épouses des nazis» - publié
à Munich en 2000) est un ouvrage de synthèse et de vulgarisation sur les
figures féminines de proue du régime hitlérien. Généralement mariées aux
dirigeants du Reich, admiratrices inconditionnelles du Führer, elles
partagèrent la vie, la foi, les heures de gloire et d�épreuve des chefs nazis.
Elles servirent souvent d�exemples et de cautions voire de porte-parole à la
politique nationale-socialiste auprès des Allemandes qui votèrent
majoritairement pour Hitler et le NSDAP et donnèrent aussi à l�étranger une
image «glamour» ou romantique du couple nazi modèle. Il est vrai qu�Hitler les
cantonna toutes à un rôle conforme à son idée de la femme racialement pure et
nationaliste d�obéissance conjugale, de dévouement domestique et d�adhésion
naïve aux idéaux définis par les cerveaux masculins.
Publié avant celui de Knopp sur le même thème, le livre de Sigmund
(universitaire de formation) se base sur les mêmes sources (le corpus est bien
établi désormais et ne devrait guère s�élargir depuis la mort des derniers
témoins et acteurs de l�entourage direct d�Hitler) mais en donne � c�est un
intérêt de ce livre destiné à un public plus exigeant à ce sujet - une
bibliographie substantielle quoique non exhaustive. Des notes en bas de page
précisent l�origine des affirmations et des citations de l�auteur. Autre
supériorité, encore méthodologique, sur Knopp : l�auteur se fait l�écho de
certains débats d�interprétation sur les sources, quand Knopp se tient
davantage à sa lecture des données ou reste plus allusif. Sur le fond, les
auteurs sont parfois complémentaires mais s�accordent remarquablement, gage
d�un large consensus des historiens, même si l�influence d�un autreur a pu
jouer sur le travail de l�autre. Le choix des «femmes d�Hitler» offre un
dernier point de comparaison : celles de Knopp incluaient les stars Zarah
Leander, Marlene et l�égérie wagnérienne Winifred Wagner, mais pas les deux
épouses du puissant et redoutable Goering, ce «complice d�Hitler»
selon l�expression d�un des plus grands historiens du nazisme, David Irving.
Elles figurent en revanche dans le livre de Sigmund qui traite également,
comme Knopp, d�Eva Braun, de Magda Goebbels, de Leni Riefenstahl. Knopp laisse
de côté l�amour platonique quasi-incestueux d�Hitler pour Geli Raubal, qui
fait l�objet d�un chapitre chez Sigmund. Deux autres figures de ces huit
femmes du IIIème Reich : la jeune Henriette von Schirach, épouse de Baldur,
chef des jeunesses hitlériennes et Gertrud Scholtz-Klink, seule responsable
politique nazie de sexe féminin, chef dérisoire et méprisée de la Ligue des
femmes du Reich.
Le principe de sélection des auteurs ne tient pas au sexe mais à une optique
qui explique ces choix : tandis que Knopp s�intéresse à l�homme Hitler et
cherche à entrer dans sa psychologie pour éclaircir son mystère et dissiper la
fascination, Sigmund est plus sensible à la part prise par certaines femmes
décidées dans un régime pourtant misogyne. Les deux auteurs s�accordent
d�ailleurs sur l�étrange fascination réciproque des nazis et des femmes, sur
les contradictions entre discours et relations effectives ou affectives. Ils
s�accordent aussi sur ces parcours étonnants de femmes très différentes, à
certains égards féministes ou indépendantes, souvent ambitieuses et
opportunistes, parfois fidèles à un double engagement politique et privé
jusqu�à la fin.
Le livre débute par une synthèse, «Hitler et la femme allemande», qui insiste
sur le décalage entre les femmes présentées ici et l�idéal officiel (les trois
K : Kinder, Kirche, Küche : enfants, église, cuisine). Coquette sportive (Eva)
ou grande bourgeoise divorcée (comme Magda Goebbels), aristocrate aventurière
comme la première madame Göring, actrice et flambeuse comme la seconde,
militante et propagandiste délaissant son foyer comme Gertrud Scholtz, elles
ne prennent pas au sérieux le discours machiste du parti ou alors pas pour
elles-mêmes ! Ce qui provoque parfois des mises au point humiliantes. Elles
ont pourtant joué psychologiquement un rôle essentiel dans la vie de leurs
compagnons.
Les chapitres défilent consacrés aux portraits de Carin Göring «idole
nordique et personnage culte», morte en 1931 après avoir encouragé
Hermann dans la voie du nazisme, conçu comme épopée chevaleresque (elle seule
a droit à une sorte de culte officiel), puis Emmy, la remplaçante, actrice
médiocre et ambitieuse (ridiculisée par Klaus Mann dans son roman Mephisto)
qui joue habilement de la psychologie de Göring pour devenir la «grande dame»
du Reich et partager les fastes monarchiques et la mégalomanie du pilleur
d�art qu�est le maréchal-mécène, sans rien assumer des crimes du créateur de
la Gestapo ; «première dame du Troisième Reich», Magda Goebbels
(appelée bizarrement «Martha» - p.140), dont l�idylle avec le sioniste
Arlosoroff est révélée � Sigmund pense que son meurtre mystérieux en 1933 est
une affaire intra-sioniste, Knopp envisage un coup de Goebbels ; Leni
Riefenstahl, «la reine des amazones», géniale cinéaste des forces
primitives passée du sublime alpin et de la volonté sportive au triomphe de
celle d�Hitler et de ses fêtes communautaires d�enthousiasme, de force et de
discipline, vraie nazie de c?ur, jusqu�à l�expérience des massacres de
Pologne, amnésique et affabulatrice après 1945.
Les chapitres les plus originaux pour le lecteur de Knopp sont (avec ceux sur
les épouses Göringl) consacrés à Scholtz et Schirach. Militante de base
manipulée mais jamais reconnue comme une égale par la direction masculine du
parti et méprisée par les grandes dames du régime, elle fait partie des
«femmes de parade», selon l�expression condescendante et cynique d�Hitler
(p.185), avec Riefenstahl et Winifred Wagner ; jamais reçue malgré ses
demandes et sa dévotion par Hitler, elle prêche tour à tour les trois K,
animant une académie des ménagères populaires, puis la mobilisation totale à
l�usine (quand Hitler, trop tard, se décide au travail des femmes dans
l�armement) ; fidèle à l�idéologie, elle plaide en vain pour la reconnaissance
de certains talents «exceptionnels», car elle est considérée comme un rouage
subalterne par Hitler ; restant nazie jusquà sa mort et défendant d�ailleurs
la thèse d�égards nazis particuliers pour les femmes, elle incarne aveuglément
une ligne idéaliste et relativement égalitaire dans le mouvement.
Henriette von Schirach, «élève du Führer», forme avec Baldur le jeune
couple des protégés, des enfants gâtés d�Hitler. Incompétent à l�éducation de
la jeunesse, Baldur devient Gauleiter épurateur de Juifs de Vienne et
travaille avec Eichmann et Franck à la solution finale, mais échappe à la mort
à Nuremberg par ses aveux partiels, tandis que sa femme, nazie «sentimentale»
grondée par Hitler et entichée de «culture», ne pâtit guère de la
dénazification.
Le lecteur s�informera aussi des hypothèses sur le «suicide» de Geli Raubal et
sur l�étrange deuil d�Hitler : Hitler, qui n�est pas impuissant et n�a rien
d�un eunuque - une vieille idée s�effondre - ne dédaigne pas la chair dans les
alcôves secrètes que son photographe Hoffmann lui prépare, et prétendra avoir
renoncé au mariage par fidélité à sa nièce disparue ; le même Hoffmann
présentera à «monsieur Wolf» (en allemand : «loup») son employée Eva Braun,
future secrétaire «particulière» du Führer. La «godiche» (expression
affectueuse privée !) deviendra madame Hitler quelques heures avant leur
suicide.
Avec Knopp et Sigmund, nous disposons désormais d�un bilan fiable sur les
femmes du premier cercle nazi, qui peut se comparer à l�histoire sociale des
femmes et de la politique familiale du Reich.
Nicolas Plagne
Droits de reproduction et de diffusion
réservés © Parutions 2007
|
Where Egos Dare: The
Fathers 4 Justice Story
(Hardcover)
by
Graham Manson
(Author)
RRP:
£16.99
Price:
£11.75
& eligible for Free UK delivery on orders over £15 with Super Saver
Delivery.
See details and conditions
You Save:
£5.24 (34%)
Availability:
Not yet published: you may still order this title. We will dispatch it to
you when we receive it from the publisher. Dispatched from and sold by
Amazon.co.uk.
Reviews
Book Description
Insider account of the Fathers4Justice campaign.
Synopsis
What drives a man
with no children to campaign for the rights of fathers? Graham Manson
joined Fathers 4 Justice in October 2003 and within months worked his way
to the top, becoming National Projects Co-ordinator of the notorious
campaign group. Organizing stunts such as the storming of York Minster and
Batman on Buckingham Palace, Graham was regarded by many as the driving
force behind the group. His story reveals what went on behind the scenes -
and how a pressure group, which seemed to have the world at its feet, was
brought to its knees by in-fighting, infiltrators and inflated egos.
|
Unisex toilets bad for the environment
National Post, Tuesday, March 27, 2007.
Letters to the Editor:
Re: Unisex toilets may come to campus,
March 23.
Unisex toilets not only strip away basic
human dignity fro the sake of a few
individuals interested in degenderizing the
population for politically correct
reasons - they are also environmentally
unfriendly.
Urinals exist in men's washrooms because
they offer a way to save water.
Compared to a regular toilet unit, a urinal
uses half the amount of water per
flush. Even a low-flush toilet is not
match for the water savings of a urinal.
It would be wiser - and far more economical
for our universities - to offer some
psychiatric counselling to those few
individuals who feel conflicted about using
segregated washrooms.
|
Sarkozy : « J’ai accordé deux fois plus de carte de séjours à des étrangers
malades que le gouvernement de Lionel Jospin»
|
Characteristics of Callers to the Domestic Abuse Helpline
for Men
Journal of Family Violence (2007)
22:6372
DOI 10.1007/s10896- 006-9052- 0
Published online: 10 February 2007
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007
Characteristics of Callers
to the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men
By Denise A. Hines, Jan Brown & Edward Dunning
Abstract: Intimate partner violence (IPV) bywomen against men has been
the subject of much debate. Feminists typically argue that IPV is committed
only by men against women. Others argue that violence is a human problem and
women also commit much IPV. To resolve these debates, IPV has been classified
into two categories: common couple violence captured by population-based
studies,and patriarchal terrorism, captured by studies of battered women. This
typology ignores male victims of extreme IPV. The current study addresses this
omission by describing 190 male callers to the Domestic Abuse Helpline for
Men. All callers experienced physical abuse from their female partners, and a
substantial minority feared their wives' violence and were stalked. Over
90% experienced controlling behaviors, and several men reported frustrating
experiences with the domestic violence system. Callers' reports indicated that
their female abusers had a history of trauma, alcohol/drug
problems, mental illness, and homicidal and suicidal ideations.
Keywords:
Abused men, Intimate partner violence, Domestic violence, Female
violence
D. A. Hines
University of Massachusetts- Lowell,
Department of Criminal Justice,
870 Broadway St., Lowell, MA 01801
email: Denise
Hines@uml.edu
J. Brown
Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women,
PO Box 252, Harmony, ME 04942, USA
E. Dunning
Family Interventions Project,
464 Sutton Way, Grers Valley, CA 96945, USA
|
Une autre petite shot juste
parce que c'est agréable de se débarrasser d'une personne méprisable
vermine
[vDYmin]
n. f.
•
XIIe;
lat. vermina, plur. de vermen « ver »
1¨ Ensemble
des insectes (puces, poux, etc.) parasites de l'homme et des animaux.
« Son linge
fourmille de vermine » (Dorgelès).
à Par métaph.,
littér.
« Scrupules, vermine de la volonté » (Renard).
2¨ (1576)
Fig. et littér.
Ensemble
nombreux d'individus méprisables, nuisibles à la société.
Þ canaille,
racaille. « Un des plus décriés représentants de cette vermine »
(Bloy). — Fam.
Personne
méprisable.
Þ peste,
gale. « arracher pour vos enfants, des griffes de cette vermine,
une fortune » (Balzac).
|
Robert Campeau ruiné par son divorce
|
Chronique cinéma
|
|
|
.jpg)
