|
|
Content d'être un gars
|
|
Mardi , le 3 avril 2007 |
|
.jpg)
Victimes de préjudices
… les médias SONT aussi déconnectés de la réalité que les politiciens.
Le poids des mots et des images reflète leurs propres aspirations (les auteurs veulent dire « préjugés »; il n’y avait qu’a voir quel sycophante Bernard de Rome fut avec Françoise David, la leadeurE de Québec Suicidiare, alors qu’il fut très agressif avec Mario Dumont; le Parti vert, tout aussi marginal, fut traité distraitement).
Les chroniqueurs, journalistes, animateurs d'émissions de télé, tous les politiciens qui s'invitent et s'encensent mutuellement …SONT … des bien-pensants? Parfois, ils deviennent même politiciens ou vice versa.
Ces «faiseurs de nouvelles» … se retrouvent … dans les mêmes conférences de presse, les mêmes cocktails et autres réunions pour ajuster leur langue de bois et leurs opinions en fonction des idées à la mode dans les bars branchés.
Les bien-pensants, ce sont ces intellectuels «enrichis» habiles à maquiller la vérité en jouant sur les mots (i.e. a MENTIR), les chiffres et même certaines valeurs. Ils en modifient le sens et la portée afin de leur donner une apparence de vérité. Bien plus que d'informer, leur but consiste à influencer l'opinion publique. (i.e. ils font de la PROPAGANDE … « progressiste »)… chers amis, vous êtes déconnectés, votre crédibilité s'effrite, sortez un peu de la métropole, élargissez le cercle de vos fréquentations.
(En effet, sortez donc de votre « provincialisme » montréalais, élargissez vos esprits étroits et bornés …).
« Plate-forme pour l'égalité des femmes » : pour se préparer aux élections au Québec, le 26 mars 2007
La Ville de Montréal adopte son projet de politique d'égalité des femmes et des hommes
"Aujourd'hui, l'Amérique serait outrée si les troupes des Nations Unies entraient dans Los Angeles pour restaurer l'ordre. Demain elle en sera reconnaissante! Ceci est particulièrement vrai s'il leur était dit qu'un danger extérieur, qu'il soit réel ou promulgué, menace leur existence. C'est alors que les peuples du monde demanderont à être délivrés de ce mal. L'unique chose que tous les hommes craignent est l'inconnu. Confrontés à ce scénario, les droits individuels seront volontairement abandonnés au profit de la garantie de leur bien-être assuré par le gouvernement mondial."
Henry Kissinger, Conférence Bilderberg, Evians, France, 1991
Les
Franc-maçons du Québec
Appel de propositions de projet - Jeunes femmes, féminisme et perspectives futures
Avril le mois des grosses couennes
CNN Video - 200 Active Duty Soldiers Dissent on the Iraq War
Rose Montero, the famous Spanish columnist and novelist of El Paìs, member of the critical feminista current �the other feminists�, the past Tuesday published this plea against masculine discriminació n and the �Integral Law of Measures of Protection against Gender Violence� of 2004, law that consecrates positive discriminacion because of sex in penal matter.
Font-tu assez pitié
Font chier
Loveland story isn'tDr Charles CorryLove and marriage in the new millennium
They started dating in high school and married on September 3, 2000. A child soon followed and another a couple of years later. As with most young couples with children, times were tough although they managed to purchase a house.
She was in charge of family finances, but didn't do well at it. In 2005 they were hit with foreclosure on their home. After 5 years of marriage they separated in June 2005 at her request, supposedly because she felt bad about the foreclosure. She was then 24 and Jason was 27.
She complained that she had never been on her own she needed some time, and wanted to force herself to learn to mange money. She assured Jason it was a temporary situation and he reluctantly agreed, all the while asking that they go to marriage counseling. She refused.
But there was more to the story. She had gone back to school in September 2003 and Jason was the parent taking care of the children from the time he picked them up from daycare until they went to bed. Then she decided nightlife was more exciting than her family. It started as just once a week, but soon grew into every night in the local bars while, after Jason got the kids to bed, he'd lie awake waiting for her to come home drunk around 3 AM. He'd try to talk to her about the problem, to no avail, and then he'd have to get up at 5:30 AM to go to work. That went on from December 2004 until their separation in June 2005. All the while their debts were mounting.
Even through this Jason never gave up on his children or family. He found a place to live, took care of the house foreclosure, and began to gain control over his life again. Her response was to treat him worse and worse with every new day.
Jason was naturally confused about what was going on but was trying hard to make things work for the sake of his family. After their separation he was paying for half the children's daycare and lent her money for the damage deposit on her apartment, and other things she needed. She wanted nothing to do with him unless she needed money. Needless to say, the relationship was getting worse, not better, and they both knew it.Enter the DV and divorce industry
On August 21, 2005, after being separated for 2 months, Jason picked up their two boys (then 2 and 5) with the intent of going to Horsetooth Reservoir with his brother for a day of Sunday boating. However, the weather was windy and his brother decided not to get the boat out. Instead, they all went to Jason's mother's house to swim in her pool.Jason took the kids back to their mother at 7:30 PM but when she found out they had gone swimming instead of boating she became irrationally angry. She insisted Jason should have called her and threatened to never let him see the kids again. He apologized for not calling but hadn't thought that it was a big deal that they went to his mother's home and not to the lake. Certainly the kids were safer playing in the pool with dad than in a small boat on a lake on a blustery day.
After she had vented her spleen, Jason tried to give her a hug as he was leaving, as he customarily did. She got angry again and kicked him out. He went home, upset and sad as he had countless times before, but not thinking anything more of it.
Jason had the kids again the next day and took them back to their mother around 9 PM without further incident.
.*1 Note that the police were not responding to an incident in progress but he was arrested without a warrant, underwent a full body-cavity search, and spent 26 hours in the Larimer County Detention Center before being released on a personal-recognizance bond with the required mandatory restraining order that stated he could not see his kids.Then he had them again on Wednesday, August 24, 2005. This time when he took them back to their mother at 7:30 PM the Loveland police were waiting for him. They informed him that his wife had filed a domestic violence charge against him claiming he had grabbed her and tried to sexually assault her on Sunday when he'd brought the children home
In the two months prior to his arrest, Jason had been hospitalized for depression, tried to convince wife to go to marriage counseling, which she refused to do despite her insistence she didn't want a divorce, let her move out because she said she needed some time to sort things out and learn to manage finances on her own. And now, because of the domestic violence charge, Jason lost his job. Neither one had yet filed for divorce.
Jason later learned, through conversations and emails that friends and his brother's fiancé shared with him, that his wife had been planning this for several months. When they separated she moved into an apartment for which she had been on a wait list for 6 months. She also took every single piece of furniture and possession that they had worked for throughout the marriage.
She left him with the credit card bills and the delinquent mortgage.
Case 2005M201226 - Domestic Violence. Statute 18-3-204 Assault 3 - Knowingly/Recklessly causing injury. Class: Misdemeanor 1. Event date: 8/21/2005. Arrest date: 8/24/2005. Case Close date: 6/15/2006.*1.
Finding the right lawyer
On September 1, 2005, Jason met with a highly-recommended domestic violence lawyer in Loveland.*2 This attorney advised Jason from the beginning not to take his case to trial. He claimed that Loveland was such a conservative town that the majority of domestic violence cases that went before a jury resulted in a conviction simply because of the nature of the crime. Her word against his was nearly all it took in most cases. Because the prosecutor claimed there were pictures of bruises, Jason was told he had little to no chance of winning even before he saw the "evidence." He also told Jason that if he was convicted it would be on his record permanently. But this incompetent shyster didn't mention that a plea bargain is a conviction and would remain on Jason's record permanently as well. Nor was Jason told that a guilty plea would prevent him from being the custodial parent of his sons.
It took this attorney nearly 7 months after requesting copies of the pictures prosecutors claimed showed bruises on his wife to finally obtain them. In the interim Jason still hadn't been arraigned, and thus his right to a speedy trial was circumvented. Once they did receive the pictures, no bruises were visible except one very light mark on her forearm. Of course there are any number of explanations as to why someone might have a mark on their arm and the pictures were apparently not taken until 3 days after she claimed she was assaulted. Any reasonably competent criminal defense attorney should have been able to discredit such "evidence."
Despite the weakness of the evidence against him, the attorney told Jason again that his best option was to plead guilty and plea bargain for a deferred sentence. Jason was told that if he had no further incidents the DV charge would be dropped and, for a fee, his record could be sealed. This attorney's misrepresentation is typical of unscrupulous attorneys who take clients retainers and then sell them down the river with a plea bargain.Lacking the zealous representation of a competent attorney, and without prior knowledge or experience with the legal system, Jason then took the plea bargain.
. At the time the EJF had this attorney on our list of recommended attorneys as well. However, any attorney who proposes up front that their client take a plea bargain in a DV case is automatically removed. Unfortunately, it is usually only through cases like Jason's that we learn about how an attorney actually handles DV cases as compared to what they claim to do.*2
She files for divorce
Any veteran of the DV and divorce industry knows the next step in the game is for the wife to file for divorce now that she has custody of the kids and a restraining order. Following the script, Jason was served divorce papers on September 28, 2005, demanding full custody of their two boys.
About 3 weeks after filing the DV charge, she had her father give Jason a letter telling him the only way he could see the kids was if he paid her for some of her expenses and met several other demands. She dictated how and when his time with the kids was to be spent. Withholding parenting time for money is against Colorado state law and even the female judge called the letter a ransom note. But no penalties attached to her unlawful demands.The divorce was naturally a bitter one and legal fees for a divorce attorney alone were $4,000. The DV lawyer cost an additional $1,000 to do nothing but destroy Jason's life. A lot of money for someone who had next to nothing and a mountain of debt to start with.
With a DV charges, and later conviction, the family court was against Jason from the outset. No matter how much Jason wanted to be a father for his boys, he became simply a paycheck.
Both during the temporary orders hearing on November 15, 2005, and the final orders hearing on February 22, 2006, she was caught lying, but nothing was done. Ultimately, because she had controlled the parenting time for so long, and with a restraining and no contact order in place so he could not contact her or see his boys unless she allowed it, she was given full custody. The boys now can only see their father four times a month, every other weekend and on alternating weeks every other Monday.However, because of hard evidence that his wife was incapable of managing her finances, which had resulted in the boys jumping from one daycare to another, child support payments are made directly to daycare providers instead of to her. So neither parent wins, the kids lose, and the DV and divorce industry grows richer.
The ongoing vendetta
Since Jason's domestic violence charge, three additional formal complaints have been made that demonstrate how Jason's ex-wife tries to use the legal system to secure control over situations she wants changed, and to ensure Jason and his family have minimal contact with his boys.
Two weeks after the temporary orders hearing, on November 30, 2005, Jason's wife called the Larimer County sheriff, case #05-771, on Jason's father, with whom Jason is living, to investigate an unsafe house. She claimed the drinking water was brown, the house was unclean, there were no beds for the children to sleep on and that they were being made to sleep on the floor, etc. Jason was not home the day the sheriff came, and Jason's dad wisely refused to let the sheriff inspect the house without a warrant.Following that complaint, on December 27, 2005, social services caseworker Mykel Flory came to Jason's father's house to investigate a report of the house being unsafe. This time Jason was home and let her in. In Jason's words the social worker was stunned after inspecting the house and finding nothing. She asked why Jason thought someone would do that and he explained the divorce situation. Ms. Flory's comment was that she would advise the caller about the difference between a legitimate concern and a false report.
Their divorce was final March 1, 2006, but that was hardly the end of her vindictiveness.
On March 9, 2006, Jason's now ex-wife again filed a complaint with the Loveland Police Department, incident # 06-13008, against Daniel Peterson (Jason's stepfather) for making threats against her when she came to pick up the boys from his mother and stepfather's house (Jason's parents and Jason's former in-laws provide drop off and pick up locations for the boys).
Jason's divorce lawyer also received a call from his wife's attorney saying that Daniel threatened her and she "feared for her life."
Daniel's son was at home and heard the conversation. No threat was ever made. What did happen was Daniel asked her if she was getting married because one of the little boys had been very upset that night and told Jason he got in trouble for having a black crayon in his pocket that ruined her wedding dress that she had washed the night before. Daniel offered advice and expressed concern about what she said around the boys to avoid upsetting them. The conversation was friendly and at its end, she and Daniel agreed if there was anything else like this that ever came up to call each other or exchange emails. The following night Daniel was taken completely off guard by the phone call from the police.
Then in late July of 2006 she filed another false report with the Loveland Police Department that Jason didn't have car seats in his jeep when he had the boys. Jason did notice police cars being around the drop off point for the next few weeks, wasting resources better used elsewhere for public safety.
After completing domestic violence treatment, obtaining unsupervised probation status, and numerous emails back and forth between Jason and his ex-wife regarding issues about their boys, Jason told his ex-wife he planned on attending the boys' yearly doctor exams on March 16, 2007. Jason had only ever missed one of his boys doctor appointments prior to separating.
When his ex-wife realized the restraining order/no contact order was no longer in effect, she immediately filed another temporary restraining order based solely on the previous (almost 2 year old) DV charge. A hearing on her request to impose a permanent restraining order on Jason was held Wednesday, March 28, 2007. Her request was denied and the temporary order was lifted.However, there is absolutely no reason she can't go "judge shopping" and find one more sympathetic to her fears that the boy's father might actually want to be informed about their medical condition. Or she can make up any other excuse with the help of a publicly-funded "victim advocate" or shelter worker since there are no penalties for making false allegations of abuse and subornation of perjury is not a crime in Colorado.
Such games can, and do go on for years while the children's lives are destroyed and the DV and divorce industry grow rich from the public purse.
The saddest thing about this story is that it is so typical.(This is the story of of a US brother but his story is ours....JS)In a Time of Deceit the Truth is a Revolutionary Act" -- George Orwell
Aux organisateur du Forum social québécois:
Problème d'orientation thématique : féminisme; l'égalité concerne les hommes aussi.
Bonjour,
Je suis émerveillé et excité par la mise sur pied d'un tel projet que le votre. Il est impératif que de tels forums se mettent en place au Québec pour orienter la société vers la démocratie et les enjeux qui nous concerne vraiment, tout en sortant du politique. Cependant un grande faille à votre concept m'interpelle et me consterne. Il s'agit de l'égalité sexuelle.
La thématique que vous abordez sur le sujet de l'égalité est très claire: Les enjeux et stratégies féministes. Un sentiment de pathétisme m'envai face au constat du choix que vous avez fait jusqu'à maintenant par rapport à l'orientation sur le sujet. Pourquoi parler de féminisme, alors que le sujet et le débat de fond devrait être L'égalité Sexuelle. Il existe une énorme différence entre les deux. Le féminisme est une idéologie qui se consacre à faire en sorte que les femmes obtiennent de plus en plus de gain dans toutes les sphères sociales pour atteindre l'égalité entre les hommes et les femmes. Le mouvement se concentre UNIQUEMENT sur les besoin des femmes. Pour résumé ce que je veux apporter à vos yeux, le féminisme à pour but de conquérir l 'égalité des femmes. Le problème ici, c'est qu'il existe dans notre société, depuis que ce mouvement a débuté, de l'inégalité chez les hommes de notre société, et ce par rapport aux femmes. Le vrai enjeux ici est donc d'amener le débat vers l' égalité sexuelle et non pas vers l'égalité des femmes. Différents termes, différentes idées de fond. Le terme même de féminisme se rapporte aux femmes, faudrait-il pour les hommes créer un consortium masculin? Je crois que tout le monde est d'accord que de telles mesures favorisent la guerre des sexes et que nous voulons tous la paix des sexes!
Alors voilà ce que je demande: changer le thème titré ''Les enjeux et stratégies féministes'' par ''L'égalité sexuelle'' er orienter le débat vers l'égalité et non vers les femmes. Ne creusez pas une tranché sexuelle qui favorise la guerre. Cela étant dit, je suis disposé à vos proposition et demande qu'en à la participation dans ce domaine, soit en terme d'organisation ou autre. Merci de considérer avec le sérieux que vous vous devez d'avoir le problème auquel l'intégrité du Forum Social Québécois fait face.
Bien à vous,
Philippe
"DADDY'S GONE!"
April 7th, World Memorial Day
On the April 7th 2007, Rome will be holding the first World Memorial Day in
remembrance of all those fathers who killed themselves, destroyed by the
pain because the contacts with their children were blocked in separation.
Last year, in the European Union (source E.U.), 2.000 fathers killed
themselves as they were prevented in seeing their children after the
separation.
The symbol date of 7th April originates from the suicide of the Aosta
(Northern Italy) Junior School teacher, Andrea Sonatore, who gave himself
fire in front of the Court House at Aosta as the judge prevented him from
seeing his daughter after the separation with his wife.
Many countries all over the world will be partecipating this celebration;
last year this event has been held in several Italian cities ( Rome , Milan ,
Caserta , Palermo ).
Nobel prize Dario Fo expressed his solidarity at Milan .
The list of associates will soon follow.
The Fathers Army
Giorgio Ceccarelli
Le boycott de la Banque Nova Scotia s’impose
(recherche, R. Tremblay)
F4J Shared Parenting online petitionFor all of you who were concerned of security issues with the F4J Shared Parenting online petition, I have requested appropriate changes at Petition Online and their tech support people have come through. Your postal address no longer appears in the public signature list, but it remains a mandatory field for the printed list that will be submittted to parliament. Only your name, a YES/NO field for Age of Majority, and your comments appear in the public list.I encourage all non-custodial parents and their extended family and friends, if you have not yet signed the petition online, please do so at http://www.petition online.com/ rpesp2ca/ petition. html . If you have signed it, please circulate the link as far and wide across Canada.Please let's use the power of the internet and public scrutiny to show our government and judiciary that reforms are long overdue.(recherche, R. Tremblay)
EJF newsletter - Ottawa's notorious Bill 117 comes to Colorado 3/23/07BackgroundIn the fall of 2000 legislators in Ottawa, Canada, introduced Bill 117 that provided that any woman could have a man restrained, imprisoned, and his property transferred to her all in the same day without any pretense of due process. Writing for the Ottawa Citizen, columnist Dave Brown noted:"The new legislation is based on the premise women in abusive relationships can't escape because they are economically dependent. The intent is to correct this by making it possible to immediately transfer all property to her.
Written into the scheme are ex parte applications. The alleged abuser doesn't have to be present when the order seizing his property is made. Application for an Intervention Order can be made by anyone in a one-to-one relationship, including dating.
...It will take precedence over any acquittal, dismissal or withdrawal of a criminal charge, or any order under any statute, including the Divorce Act.
Transference of property will include leased property, even if she is only a date, and is binding on the landlord. If rent is in arrears, the landlord must collect from him. She will have no liability."While I understand Bill 117 became law it has rarely, if ever, been enforced as the inherent violations of English law are so blatant that even today's courts would be likely to quickly void it. However, that does not mean the idea and process have faded away.In Your Lucky Night, written in 2002, I put forth an example of how, under Colorado law, a woman can pick up a man in a bar and end up with all his property and possessions by obtaining an ex parte restraining order claiming abuse or domestic violence. Since writing that essay many men have contacted the Equal Justice Foundation to tell us how something very similar was done to them. And EJF member Elizabeth has described how an illegal alien has done this to her father and is gaining U.S. citizenship in the process under VAWA, another all-too-common fraud.Male victims of this fraud have naturally reacted to this outrage by not paying the rent, cutting off the utilities and phone, closing joint accounts and credit cards, canceling insurance, stopping car payments, etc. We have also advised a number of men that their best, and probably only option, was to let the bank foreclose on their house. And many women have found the promises of the DV and divorce industry were a financial and personal disaster for them and the children.Apparently the number of men unwilling to pay some doxy's rent, or the mortgage on the house where his wife's new boy toy now lives because of false allegations of abuse has become unacceptably large and redfems have demanded draconian legislation to "correct' the situation.
Colorado's Democratic Peoples Soviet to the rescueState senator John Morse (D-El Paso County* mailto:john.morse.senate@state.co.us ) has been happy to oblige by introducing SB07-136, which provides that Colorado courts can now require men to pay for"...rent and mortgage payments, telephone and utility services, child care costs, temporary possession of personal property, and insurance,"
when issuing an ex parte restraining order. Note also that there is no requirement that "child care costs" be limited to the man's biological children.Currently the Colorado Senate has passed this bill unanimously and it is undergoing final passage by the House.Upon signature by the governor any woman who is angry at her boyfriend, a "working girl" on South Nevada near Fort Carson in Colorado Springs, or a wife having an affair can claim they are "Victims of domestic violence...unable to access resources to seek lasting safety options;" and have their living expenses guaranteed by filing an ex parte restraining order.Of course, under Morse's scheme, a man who fails to pay the rent or mortgage, etc., will go to jail for violating the restraining order, no doubt losing his job and income in the process. By casting a man into the street with an ex parte restraining order, and then jailing him, the entire family is now left without support. While that suits the interests of the DV industry and the welfare bureaucracy, it is destroying our society.SB07-136 also claims that "Thirty-three states recognize existing legal obligations for support, payment, or ownership of personal or real property in order to protect victims in civil protection orders." However, Ottawa, Canada, is the only other case I've seen of such complete disregard of civil rights and apparently deliberate attempt to destroy families and marriage.
Feeding the DV and divorce industryIt is also of interest to note that the best estimate of actual domestic violence is from the National Crime Victim Surveys (NCVS) that suggests only 1 in 250 (0.04%) of households a year suffer what citizen's regard as a criminal DV incident. From that estimate there would be fewer than 8,000 DV incidents in Colorado a year. However, for fiscal year 2006 Colorado courts report 7,237 restraining orders were issued for domestic abuse and 14,123 misdemeanor cases of domestic violence, wherein a restraining order is mandatory, for a total of at least 21,360 restraining orders (felony cases are not included). On the face of it there appear to be 2.5 times more DV court cases than citizens are reporting to the statisticians at NCVS. Clearly there is reason to suspect domestic violence laws are being grossly abused.It cannot be claimed that false allegations by women in order to obtain a restraining order are uncommon or new. The June 11, 1998, edition of Denver's Westword documented a case of two sisters making a game of charging men with DV. The EJF has heard numerous cases of women getting a restraining order and giving their boyfriend's address as their residence, then selling off all his possessions. A woman in Colorado Springs was caught after her third round of that game. Other women have probably been even more successful. And, when caught, virtually nothing is done to these women.Additionally, fewer than 8,000 cases of domestic violence a year in a state with a population of 4.7 million does not represent an epidemic and hardly mandates draconian legislation directing the ex parte seizure of men's property in direct violation of their civil rights.The basis for such tyrannical legislation becomes clearer when we note there were 24,750 divorce (dissolution of marriage) petitions filed during 2006 in Colorado, a number rather close to the 21,360 restraining orders issued. And what better way to encourage the destruction of marriages, families, and relationships than by guaranteeing a woman the house, the car, the kids, the bank account, and anything else she wants if she files a restraining order or calls 911 without giving a man the chance to defend himself.The similarity of such measures as SB07-136 to the Russian Effort To Abolish Marriage after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution seems so blatantly obvious that the Colorado soviet must be either brain dead or deliberately enacting the redfem ideology into law.Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.____________________________* The sponsor of this abomination, John Morse, is a freshman state senator without previous experience, who has chosen to dive off the deep end without checking to see if the pool is full of cow manure. Morse lists his occupation as "executive" but a more traditional title for what he is doing would be commissar.--___________________________________DISCLAIMERNOTE: If you would like to be removed from our mailing list please respond to this message with REMOVE in the subject line. Comments or criticisms of our policies or Web sites should be addressed to mailto:comments@ejfi.org.You are receiving this message because (1) you asked to be added to our mailing list; (2) you sent the EJF an e-mail or requested help from us; (3) you are known to work on issues related to men's or father's rights; (4) you are known to be interested in civil liberties and equal justice for all; (5) your name and address appeared as an addressee on email sent to us; or (6) you are a member of or contribute to the Equal Justice Foundation._____________________________________________________________________________Issues of interest to the Equal Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/ are:Civilization http://www.ejfi.org/Civilization/Civilization.htmCourts and Civil Liberties http://www.ejfi.org/Courts/Courts.htmDomestic Violence http://www.ejfi.org/DV/dv.htmDomestic Violence Against Men in Colorado http://www.dvmen.org/Emerson case http://www.ejfi.org/emerson.htmFamilies and Marriage http://www.ejfi.org/family/family.htmProhibitions and the War On Drugs http://www.ejfi.org/Prohibition/Prohibition.htmVote Fraud and Election Issues http://www.ejfi.org/Voting/Voting.htm
_____________________________________________________________________________
The Equal Justice Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation supported by members and contributions. Dues are $25 per year and you may join at http://www.ejfi.org/Join.htm. Additional information about the Foundation can be found at http://www.ejfi.org/Intro.htm. Ideas on what you might do to help are outlined at http://www.ejfi.org/What_you_can_do.htm.Contributions are tax deductible and can be made on the Web at http://www.ejfi.org/join2.htm or by sending a check to the address below. Federal employees in Colorado can contribute to the EJF through the Combined Federal Campaign. We are listed in six Colorado regions. In the Denver region our agency number is 4086. In Pike's Peak #6024. In Larimer County # 8032. In Weld County # 4022. In SW Colorado (Mesa Verde-Durango) # A003. In western Colorado and Utah #6930.
______________________________________________Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.
PresidentEqual Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/
455 Bear Creek Road
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906-5820
Personal home page: http://corry.ws
Curriculum vitae: http://www.marquiswhoswho.net/charleselmocorry/Default.aspxThe good men may do separately is small compared with what they may do collectively.
Benjamin Franklin
(recherche, R. Tremblay)
Depuis mars 2006, une vaste campagne de sensibilisation à la violence conjugale a été lancée au début de l'année 2006 afin de contrer la violence faite à l'égard des femmes. Axée sur le caractère inacceptable et criminel de la violence conjugale, cette campagne vise l'ensemble de la population québécoise.
La première phase de cette campagne a permis d'attirer l'attention de la population en général sur la violence conjugale et de rendre possible un grand mouvement de mobilisation et de dénonciation publique qui a été bénéfique pour de nombreuses femmes.
La deuxième phase a permis de réaffirmer le caractère inacceptable et criminel de la violence conjugale en invitant les victimes et les témoins à aller chercher de l'aide auprès de l'organisme d'aide et de référence SOS violence conjugale.
Un volet de cette campagne s'adresse aux nations autochtones. Pour ce volet, des activités de promotion et de prévention adaptées à la réalité des nations amérindiennes et inuit sont en cours de réalisation, et ce, conjointement avec la Table de concertation pour le mieux-être autochtone et la Société Makivik.
Quant à la troisième phase, elle a pour objectif d'insister sur le fait que certains actes de violence conjugale sont criminels et, de ce fait, passibles de mesures pénales.
http://www.mfacf.gouv.qc.ca/thematiques/violence_conjugale/index.asp
S.O.S. violence conjugale MJQ $446,432.00 Adresse
SOS est peut-être la vache à lait de CENTRE DES FEMMES DU PLATEAU MONT-ROYAL. Une façon de s’envoyer des « clientes » afin de maintenir l’excuse d’être financé par les taxes des citoyens?
PS. La rue St-Joseph du Paletau, est bourré d’OSBL.
Le fouineur!
Métro, Boulot, Domestico .
Ou, la triple journée de la femme
En effet, le matin, dans les transports en communs, la femme lit des magazines féminins où elle apprend comment soigner sa famille, ou bien de nouvelles recettes de cuisine ou de tricot.
Il s’agit d’un travail intellectuel intense , tout en surveillant ses stations . Double activité !
L’homme , lui , lit un journal sportif ; c’est un temps de loisir !
Au boulot, la femme ne perd pas une minute ! Outre le texte à taper, il faut écouter les demandes incessantes du chef, répondre par téléphone aux clients…
Si elle téléphone pour des causes personnelles, pour un temps toujours trop court, c’est pour prendre des nouvelles de leur santé et leur donner des conseils avisés, puisés dans le magazine du matin. Encore une double , voire triple activité .
L’homme , lui, passe son temps sur son ordinateur…à jouer à des jeux vidéos ou à chercher des photos pornos ( qui perturbent le travail de la femme quand elle les regarde ). Puis il fréquente assidûment la machine à café pour raconter des blagues salaces à ses copains.
Il s’agit de loisirs plus que de travail !
Mais le soir au foyer, c’est bien pire .
En chemin, elle organise mentalement sa soirée : pas une seconde à perdre !
Achats nécessaires au repas du soir, ½ h, préparation des légumes , encore ½ h,cuisson, ¾ h de plus , écoute de la radio pour y glaner des conseils ménagers, 1H ½ supplémentaires, et même ½ h de ménage . Sans compter le lave-linge qui tourne et qu’il faut surveiller. Elle arrive à caser 6h d’activités en 2h !
L’homme, lui, part en promenade avec le chien pour aller chercher les enfants chez la nourrice, puis s’affale devant la télé avec une bière, tout en vérifiant, de loin, les devoirs des gosses !
Puis il fait la vaisselle en écoutant la radio. Encore du loisir !
Même la nuit la femme travaille.
Passons sur le remplissage du devoir conjugal, (dur, dur, quand on est fatiguée !)
Même en dormant, elle travaille . Elle pense au robinet qui fuit et que son homme n’a pas encore réparé, à son plan de vacances pour les enfants, à ce petit haut aperçu en solde et à acheter d’urgence ….
L’homme, lui, à son côté, ronfle comme un sonneur !
L’enquête, de la chercheure Madeleine de Proust ( Université Paris32, experte en études Féministe )
Dans cette étude scientifique intitulée « A la Recherche du Temps Retrouvé », basée sur des sondages téléphoniques, elle estime qu’en moyenne, une femme travaille 48 h par jour !Avec des pointes de 56 h pour les mères de jeunes enfants . Et cet état de choses empire, avec toutes ces responsabilités qu’on confie de plus en plus aux femmes !
Il est temps de légiférer sur le partage des tâches ménagères . Elle propose de créer un corps de « vérificatrices du partage » et de prévoir des sanctions pour les récalcitrants !!!