Le congrès Paroles d’hommes

Diane Bouffard sur la radio XM

 

1920 - A book entitled  The New World Order (International Organization, International Law, International Cooperation) by Frederick Charles Hicks Doubleday 1920.  He is law librarian of Columbia University, and in this book he suggests that among the most powerful few of the Great Powers, the example must be set to 'cooperate, here and there, piece by piece, in limiting the exercise of their sovereign rights.'

 

La totale

Sexisme, violence et haine, de l’école primaire à l’Université

 

Réponse à LamotteRock

 

Hommage à Jean-Claude St-Amant

17-05-08 YVES ARCHAMBAULT, CHARGÉ DE COURS À LA FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES D'ÉDUCATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL PARTIE_1

17-05-08 YVES ARCHAMBAULT, CHARGÉ DE COURS À LA FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES D'ÉDUCATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL PARTIE_2

 

Ayoye!
La ministre de l'éducation ne peut pas offrir des services adaptés aux besoins spécifiques des garçons. certaines forces politiques ne lui pardonneraient pas de défavoriser les filles.

17-05-08 MICHELLE COURCHESNE, MINISTRE DE L'ÉDUCATION ET DE LA FAMILLE PARTIE_1

17-05-08 MICHELLE COURCHESNE, MINISTRE DE L'ÉDUCATION ET DE LA FAMILLE PARTIE_2

 

Il s'est encore cassé quelque chose celui là

La rupture au masculin

 

I am a loving father blessed with children of both genders and, accordingly, logically equally opposed to misogyny and misandry.

That said, hopefully this makes it at least marginally more difficult for professional apologists for sexist hate-mongering, like Ms.  Ruddle, to dismiss my views out-of-hand solely based upon my gender.

 

Surely, a complaint against the Canadian Women’s Foundation & every single one of its corporate sponsors (or at least - most certainly - the 4 whose logos are so brazenly displayed on the offending webpage) to Ontario's alleged 'Human Rights' Commission since the 'couch' graphic quite plainly amounts to the promotion of  "discrimination via signs or symbols"  specifically barred under its Code.

 

Why? Certainly not because it/they will likely be appropriately sanctioned but, for the two-fold purpose of exposing both their hate crimes and further evidencing this phony Commission's already well known one-sided agenda-driven hypocrisy.

 

Plus, complaints and intentionally bringing blatant evil and sexist double standards to the light of day rightly shouldn't stop there.

 

No opportunities should also ever be missed to demonstrate that the left's vaunted Charter of supposed 'Rights and Freedoms' likewise isn't worth the paper it's printed upon since it's Sections 15-a and 28, allegedly guaranteeing gender equality to all, are an open joke to most any heterosexual male who's ever had the misfortune to have dealings with Canada's Courts, quasi-judicial bodies and/or most governmental agencies.

 

Every day in our Nation's so-called 'family' Courts, openly biased Judges make a shameless mockery of this imagined equality - not to mention the additional Charter 'right' of 'freedom of association' supposedly guaranteed to both fathers and their children and international Treaties to which Canada is a signatory; such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.      

 

The most galling aspect of corporate (men's as well as women's shopping dollars) and public (via direct governmental largess and ill-conceived tax laws with respect to hate-mongering phony 'charities' and 'foundations') funding of misandry is precisely that.

So, floods of 'official' complaints coupled with boycotting and public shaming offenders is its only reasonable response.

 

Our own money, surrendered voluntarily in the marketplace and compelled by taxation and/or tax deductibility loopholes, is bankrolling males' demotion to second class citizens and malicious crypto-Marxist promotion of undue acrimony between the sexes clearly aimed at the destruction of the conventional family and related denial of children's mutually loving, beneficial and emotionally healthy relationships with both of their natural parents. 

 

Plainly with - as but one of literally countless confirming examples - jobs within Ontario's public service now being 62% female-held, the one-time battle for women's rights is over and there's no socially legitimate need for a foundation "Investing in the power of women and the dreams of girls" which thus exists solely to provide lucrative employment for professional gender bigots like Ms. Ruddle and her 'DV industry' sisters  while advancing their elite self-evidently selfish anti-family socio-political agenda.  

A Candian Activist

 

 

See the original article and the response by Sarah Ruddle at:  

 

 Re: Misandry is the message

"The Canadian Women’s Foundation believes that violence against anyone is unacceptable, whether it’s perpetrated against a male or a female, and we applaud other campaigns that focus on ending violence in its other forms.

Shelter from the Storm is not an anti-male campaign, nor does it intend to convey anti-male sentiment through its creative. As a women’s organization our mandate is to focus on violence against women which is a critical issue in Canada.

What you fail to mention in your StatsCan reference to prevalence (7% of women vs. 6% of men), is that (quoted from the same report):

"women are more frequently subjected to severe forms of violence from men than men are from women: twice as many women than men were beaten by their partners, and four times as many were choked. Moreover, 16% of women who were victimized by a spouse were sexually assaulted, and twice as many female as male victims of spousal assault reported chronic, ongoing assaults. This finding suggests that despite similar prevalence rates reported by women and men, assaults on women are more serious. One shortcoming of the data is that they do not indicate the degree of force used in each of these acts. However, the impact of spousal assault, in terms of injury and other consequences, is more severe for women.   Further, the same study endorses a gender-specific approach to addressing violence: " 

"A generic approach to ending violence against all Canadians risks failing to address the different gender-specific experiences and support needs of victims of violence... While men are more likely to be injured by strangers in a public or social venue, women are in greater danger of experiencing violence from intimate partners in their own homes. Women are also at greater risk of sexual violence.

I urge readers to look beyond your bias and read the full report for  themselves:  

Sarah Ruddle, Canadian Women's Foundation sruddle@canadianwomen.org  

 

 

Soutenez les femmes de Birmanie : envoyez vos P'tites culottes pour la paix !

Je suis d'accord pour cette campagne - mais je n'ai pas encore vu des informations claires sur où et quand il faudrait envoyer les petites culottes. Devrions-nous les envoyer à la FFQ pour qu'elle les regroupe et les transmet toutes ensembles? Devrions-nous les envoyer une par une à l'ambassade birmane? Si oui, il serait utile de nous donner l'adresse.

Merci,

Ruth Rose

 

Sentez les P'tites culottes pour la paix !

Un réseau de sex shops établis dans la région de Montréal a nécocié l'achat des milliers de petites culottes féminines au cours de la campagne publicitaire intitulée les P'tites culottes pour la paix ! Les sommes receuiilies seront versées au Réseau de femmes victimes et en difficulté du Québec tout entier. On se souvient que l'organisme menait une guerre ouverte à l'Association des regroupements de femmes amochées du Québec tout entier et du Témiscamingue Ontarien. Les deux organismes se sont fusionnés en janvier 2008. L'organisme qui en est résulté est maintenant en mesure de faire bénéficier les femmes birmanes de l'action mené par les femmes solidaires du Québec tout entier et du Témiscamingue ontarien.

P'tites culottes pour la paix ! seront vendues individuellement dans un emballage opaque qui ne permettra pas de deviner le contenu de l'emballage.

 

Deux mots

Deux mots.

Premier mot.

Dormir, avoir l'air d'un imbécile, oreiller, taie d'oreiller, taie, c'est ça, deuxième mot.

Deuxième mot.

Trou, baignoire, bosse. chameau, baignoire, chameau, concave, convexe, arrête. Concave, plus court. Cave. Taie cave. Non c'est pas ça? Taie con? T'es con! T'es pas drôle.

 

Envoyez vos petites culottes pour la paix...pardon ?

"Le Réseau étudiant Droits et Démocratie veillera à ce que le message de Lanna Action for Burma soit transmis d'un bout à l'autre du Canada par l'entremise de ses délégations, qui sont présentes sur plus de 30 campus canadiens", a dit Sophie Rondeau, coordonnatrice du Réseau.

 C'est une blague ?

Hoé ! Houston appelle Appollo : il y a quelqu'un ?

 

Pour protester contre la junte birmane, envoyez votre petite culotte

 

Avis aux médias - Lancement national d'une campagne mondiale de soutien aux femmes de Birmanie

 

Hot Hot Hot!

Invitation à la communauté universitaire et autres personnes intéressées

INVITATION À TOUTES ET À TOUS

Entrée libre

Conférence publique prononcée par Ruth Rose professeure à la retraite de sciences économiques à l'Université du Québec à Montréal spécialisée en économie du travail et en sécurité du revenu dans le cadre du colloque Les femmes et l'argent de l'Université féministe d'été 2008 (voir ci-dessous)

LA PAUVRETÉ DES FEMMES ÂGÉES

Quand se conjuguent discrimination et insuffisance des régimes publics de retraite

En 2005, 32,1 % des femmes âgées de 65 ans et plus vivant seules étaient considérées comme pauvres comparativement à 19,8 % des hommes et à 1,4% seulement des couples âgés. Tout au long de leur vie, les femmes assument la majeure partie des travaux ménagers et des soins non rémunérés aux personnes. En conséquence, leur participation au marché du travail est plus faible et elles subissent une discrimination salariale ainsi que dans l'accès aux postes les mieux payés.

Les projections indiquent que, dans 40 ans, les femmes continueront d'avoir des revenus de retraite substantiellement inférieurs à ceux des hommes. Portés par la vague de libéralisme, les gouvernements actuels cherchent à renvoyer les individus à leurs propres ressources, par exemple en affaiblissant le Régime des rentes du Québec et en multipliant les avantages fiscaux pour que les particuliers assument eux-mêmes ou elles-mêmes le maintien à domicile au lieu de développer les services publics. Que faut-il faire pour permettre aux femmes de vivre véritablement un «âge d'or » après 65 ans?

Mardi 3 juin 2008
19 h 30 à 21 h 30, Amphithéâtre 1C
Pavillon Charles-De Koninck, Université Laval, Québec

Pour des renseignements supplémentaires sur la conférence et le colloque UNIVERSITÉ FÉMINISTE D'ÉTÉ
(418) 656-2131 poste 8930 ; universite-feministe-ete@fss.ulaval.ca

_Lien

Il est encore possible de s'inscrire au colloque !
LES FEMMES ET L'ARGENT À partir de la situation des femmes et des rapport sociaux de sexe, ce colloque abordera différentes facettes de l'économie et les principaux enjeux contemporains en la matière, en particulier pour les jeunes. Pour le formulaire, les modalités, les tarifs d'inscription, le programme, etc..

 

la couleur de tes bobettes? no way!

Montre-moi la couleur de tes culottes et je te dirai qui tu es? No way! Les bobettes, c'est personnel. Il y a sûrement d'autres moyens intelligents pour faire connaître les causes féministes.

Je n'envoie pas mes culottes par la malle donc je ne suis pas féministe ? Expliquez-moi ça, les décideuses qui prennent des décisions sans consulter tous les membres de Netfemmes avant de faire des annonces publiques !

Someone just responded to the entry you subscribed to at:
Articles

The title of the entry is:
Misandry is the message

You can see the comment at the following URL:

Being in the military, I frequently watch the Air Force Network (a service
that allows military members and families to view American programming
while stationed overseas), and during commercial breaks, men are often
portrayed as sexual deviants - scenes of women getting drunk at a bar and a
sinister male in the background who inevitably takes advantage of one of the
women.

Even in the commissary, posters abound saying, "We salute the WOMEN in our
military" (the capitals not exaggerrated, mind you) without any posters at
all for both sexes or for the men. Up until now, I wasn't aware that female
service meant more to our country than the men's.

Thank you Ms. Kay for the article. With an issue like this, it means a lot
more that it is written by a woman, I think. Not many would take a white
male complaining about sexism very seriously.

 

 

A Paris, la fronde singulière de femmes sans papiers

 

The title of the entry is:
Misandry is the message

You can see the comment at the following URL:

***

I wish to propose the notion modern feminism has become a political movement fueled by public money which doesn't obey rules applicable either to political organizations or to lobbies. Its sole purpose is to foster its access to public funding. Its main strategy is to discredit men by accusing anyone who dares to voice men also have needs of misandry or masculinism.  This meaningless label has yet to be reflected upon. The sooner the better.

Since governments depend on politicians electability and given the political power derived from colossal government funding granted to political feminist organizations it is unlikely politicians will be in a position to correct the situation in a foreseeable future. I deem the best hope for democracy lays with news organizations. They unfortunately are also victims of political feminist organization which control them by accusing  media
dissidence of misoginy and masculinism. Once freedom of speech is on the way of being restored there is no turning back.

***

David Page said... "The direction of all these posts, and the original article, is that white, straight men have a terrible time of it in Western society. Oh please!"

Sigh.. there are none so blind as.... ?
Yes. I was once just like you. There was a time I would not have believed any of this. Had I met myself then as I am now I guess I would have walked away and told my then wife that there must be something wrong with the fellow and that he surely must have done something to deserve what has befallen him.

You can not know how bad things really are out there for men. Especially Fathers.

As far as the biased family law aspect of things goes it is perhaps best to heed the wise words of a comrade of mine when he stated "The reason for Family Law was to 'help' families get over the end of a relationship, and to ensure the children are properly cared for. What has happened is the exact opposite. The average person does not believe that there is a serious problem with Family law. They only realize how bad it is once they get caught in its claws".

So it is with you and men like you You hear it from Barbara and from many others on these pages yet you doubt because you do not see it. But one day you might or someone else close to you might. Then you will know. Too late.

Jeremy Swanson
Fathers Rights Activist
FathersCan
Ottawa, Ontartio
Canada

***

It is about time a revolution happened...first of all stop voting for the DEM'S and REP'S, start up mens rights political party's, the two party system must go, same here in Australia, Labor/Libs, viva the revolution.This rubbish will not stop men by the million strike. I think men should have a year off work, we must stop feeding the monster that is devouring us, an international strike, tens of millions of men "forgetting" to set the clock before they go to bed.

Until men really man-up, nothing will change. Also you young men, if you are dating and the woman is a feminist dump her.Breed them out, there is NO OTHER WAY.You are better off single.Tell as many men as you can about sites like these.Make posters and put them up at uni, the mens room is good for this. If a product or media outlet (TV radio print media) bash men, dump them, because at the end of the day newspapers, TV, radio etc are just a business and so what if they go bankrupt.I have watched around 10 hours of TV this year aND IT FEELS GREAT!

***

Thankyou Barbara for this article. Unfortunately if it were a man who had written this article it would be likely have been automatically invalidated on the basis that all men are incapable of conceptualizing suffering , as it can only be felt by women as a result of men.

As a eighteen year old student I know the described attitude is endemic in my local university and is starting to impact upon a friend , who was accused wrongly of violence against a female student (I was with him at the time of the supposed attack), because they exchanged some harsh words and she decided to 'get revenge' . Whilst he was rightfully found not guilty, he has been bullied by other female students on campus, and refused entry to some classes based on his "record". Just one ordinary guy.

Just one sign of the big problem eh ?

***

The direction of all these posts, and the original article, is that white, straight men have a terrible time of it in Western society. Oh please!

***

Ms. Ruddles rejoinder to Barbara Kay clearly states that violence against men is not CWF's concern, we applaud other campaigns. Applaud silently, of course.

No comprehensive survey of violence against men has ever been undertaken, by any government. Therefore no comparison of violence perpetration and victimization is possible. Further, CWF, as other feminist organizations, proclaim some women's victimization claims as valid, on the assumption that women never lie. Rape claims, documented as over 60% false, offer insight into deceit.

Ms. Ruddle offers no verifiable public data source for her victimization litany. Such claims, echoing StatsCan's 1993, $10,000,000 Violence Against Women were exposed as misandry, including by StatsCan's. subsequent publications. Inter-spousal violence is so rare in Canada as to fall below the incidence of psychopathology.

One category of assault, unequivocally more severe for men is homicide. Since StatsCan began publishing data, twice as many men are murdered than women: 200 women vs. 400 men murdered annually. The revealing feminist rejoinder is, Those are men killing men, as though men deserved fatal violence, because of their birth.

About violence in their own homes, Ms. Ruddle “like all feminists“ omits data showing women as the primary perpetrators of violence, including homicide, against children, and adult daughters as the primary perpetrators of abuse and exploitation against elder parents. Who could be more defenseless than an infant, child or a disabled elder parent?

Endorsing a gender-specific approach to addressing violence, is amorally indistinguishable from opportunistically defining violence by religion, race or ethnicity. Ms. Ruddle and CWF’s intent is clearly to terrorize women against men. CWF does not intend to lessen abuse and violence for all Canadians.

Shame.

Jeffrey Asher

***

Well done that woman. Sadly not many women are as clear sighted as Barbara. They don't seem to be aware of how they are being manipulated by the media and the state. It is beyond critical, this problem of official misandry.

I have experienced it I have lost friends and relatives in the men's suicide epidemic which is feminisms hidden holocaust. Abortion being part of this also.

It is sinister and because it is being deliberately promoted by politicians,the media, influential men and women alike. Why? Control,power, money - divide and conquer.Orwellian and very sneaky our politicians want to lord it over us all.What better way than to get rid of men first. Thus feminism is a useful weapon of the ruling elite. In the end they will turn on women too. But increasingly people see through them and the whistle blowers are emerging...

I have to again thank Barbara for writing the truth. Its very encouraging to see a woman understand the extent of what has been happening for some time now...

***

Being raised by a single Mom and my grandmother and being an only son, I grew up with a greater respect for women than my peers. I'm an old fashioned type of guy. I'm 45, and I'm appalled.

Ladies, I was on your side for so long but you've lost me now... You have gone too far... You're being ridiculous now.

If feminists are getting hundreds of millions in government funding, and making "great strides" for women, why am I seeing Canada's Foreign Minister, "Mad Max Bernier" march into his official swearing in ceremony with "Jilted Julie Coulliard" who is showing so much cleavage it's bordering on indecent?

Good Lord... He should've matched her outfit and dressed in a speedo, beer belly, and gold chains!!! LOL!!!

Yeah, I know, she's a biker chick and the feminists will say she's not a true representation of the modern woman... Really? Hmmm... Why then am I seeing girls and women everyday, showing that much cleavage? For goodness sake, 13 yr. olds are dressed like that nowadays!!! Who taught them this? Does anyone believe their fathers taught them this? What self-respecting father would even let his daughter out of the house dressed like that???

NOT THIS EXILED FATHER!!!

Is this what those hundreds of millions have produced?

I don't need a multitude of "studies" to back me up, just look around, some things in life don't require a study!!!

It's legal in Ontario for women to walk down the street topless, how long will it be before a Foreign Minister goes to his swearing in ceremony with a topless woman on his arm? At the rate it's going now it shouldn't be long... (Jilted Julie was a gust of wind away from being the first!)

To all the self-respecting, intelligent, "classic" women, like Barbara Kay, I would implore you to speak up and help bring balance to this miserable state of affairs, the children need you, gentle-men need you, society needs you.

***

The Canadian Women's Foundation is emblematic of the new "old girls club". These Women's organisations have extensive political control to cause discriminatory gender bias in Police procedures for domestic violence, government funding for treatment of domestic violence and generating publicity that obviously portrays a pro-female and anti-male message to all of society.

Women are just as aggressive and capable of causing damage to a man. Anyone who has found themselves looking down the end of a knife or at the receiving end of a kick to the genitals will know that women are VERY capable of seriously injuring a man. Unfortunately it is the invisible scars that cause the most long lasting damage. Moreover, an abused man and an abusive women will never receive they proper treatment that they need. The cycle of abuse will continue because gender biased organisations like the Canadian Women's Foundation that only address half of the problem and not only neglect the other half of the problem but go further and publicly promote misandry.

***

I am a man who spent 20 years being the best husband and father I could be, raising my wife's two children of a previous marriage, raising our own two children...all in the face of my wife refusing to work for 14 years of our 18 year marriage and the stress and strain that caused when trying to raise a family of 6 on one salary.

During my marriage I was attacked by my wife many times. She threw a knife at me once. She hit me, scratched me, kicked me....she struck our kids to the head when they were little for no reason and without warning....

She abused me mentally all our married life.

Her father, a man I have known for 32 years, calls me the finest son in law any of his 4 daughters has. My father is proud of what I achieved now all the cards are on the table.

Yet, when she went to court she accuses me of all sorts of mis-behaviour...the courts immediately destroyed my company, froze all my bank accounts, and cast me into poverty. I have not spoken with my two youngest children since before christmas....she accuses me of 'abusing' the children and 'upsetting' them because I wrote them a letter each and sent it to the schools...

The laws are rediculously biased and misandry is pervasive........I have been the best possible husabnd I knew how to be and I am persecuted while she was a terrible wife by any standards and is treated like she just fell down from heaven.....I am advising young men today to not get married and not have babies with the women they love to avoid my situation...until many more women like you fight the cause....this is the only way out...

***

 

Corruption et pot-de-vin

 

Reining in the accusers

MISANDRY - Hatred of Men & Masculinity

 

Women can crow but men can't oink when it comes to sexism
By LIZA SARDI, CALGARY SUN Friday, January 7, 2000
Warren Farrell believes the world is sexist.

But if you think his new book --Women Can't Hear What Men  Don't Say -- is all about feminism or strictly for women,you're  wrong.

This ground-breaking book demonstrates how both sexes are hurt by gender-based anger at home and work, media images, culture and men's fear of expressing hurt feelings. It's based on five years of research and writing, and 30yearsof experience counselling almost 250,000 people. If you're about to tune out, thinking this is just another slam against women, wrong again. This San Diego-based author of The Liberated Man, Why Men Are the Way They are and The Myth of Male Power is the only man ever elected three times to the board of the powerful U.S. National Organization of Women. He's been featured eight times on Donahue, repeatedly on Oprah and CNN, and interviewed by prestigious journalists Peter Jennings, Barbara Walters and Larry King.

The answers are "not in reading my book once" but in "studying it and rehearsing with your partner," says Farrell. Learning the language of relationships, he adds, is like trading pencil and paper for a computer -- unnatural but you'll never go back. The human race has spent thousands of years learning to fight and debate and no time learning to listen and empathize, says Farrell. Modern man finds himself hopelessly deadlocked by the need to repress his feelings to become successful. The inability to express emotion doesn't mean men are afraid of intimacy but rather that there isn't a "safe" environment for them to open up. Effectively giving criticism and accepting it so that it can easily be given, is one of the first and most important topics the book covers.

Many couples, says Farrell, are afraid to understand their partners point of view partly because they fear they'll have to give in or compromise. "The inability to handle personal criticism destroys more relationships than I know," says Farrell.  Men, in particular, fear conflict with their partner because they're afraid it will lead to less intimacy; not more. Farrell's extensively-bibliographed research shows men today are in somewhat of the same passive/agressive scenario that women were in the 1950s. A woman who has a problem with her man deals with it by criticizing. "Women are more willing to initiate conflict, more willing to escale conflict, better able to handle it when it occurs and, when they have initiated it, are quicker to get over it," says Farrell. Men in the same position are fearful to do the same because they're more dependent on women for emotional and sexual approval. Taken to the extreme, the guy may win the argument but get a  cold reception -- particularly in the bedroom.

Most men then retreat to their own "cave" which could be an ulcer, drinking heavily or extended hours at the office. In the end, some stray so far they end up seeking other women, says Farrell. Women in troubled times, on the other hand, are more likely to turn to female friends or family for support and if they divorce, they're more likely to keep the kids.  Societal bias favouring women is deep and ingrained, says Farrell.

One of the most interesting chapters of the book describes how male bashing is funny while female bashing is sexist. The first can be found in Hallmark cards, the latter in a lawsuit. Take for instance, the case of Lorena and John Wayne Bobbitt. If it had been Lorena who had cheated on her husband instead of the other way around, would it have been OK for John to lop off her breasts as she did to his penis, asks Farrell. "It's never OK to kill or mutilate your partner," he adds. In another analogy, he asks if society would have accepted a "battered man syndrome" from O.J. Simpson. Most of us would have said that he can't play "helpless" but has responsibility to take care of himself, call police or leave the home before resorting to violence.

Violence against men, states Farrell unequivocally while citing more than 53 studies, has been censored. Most women's groups rely on crime statistics rather than studies to prove their case that some one in 10 women at some time in their lives experience abuse from men. But women, explains Farrell, are more likely to report abuse. Men, on the other hand, do not see violence in the home as a crime. A University of Alberta study found that 12% of husbands were victims of violence by their wives compared to 11% of wives who said they were victimized. Threats to pull funding is the reason most don't know these stats, says one U.S. professor, who pioneered the analysis of research in domestic violence. Farrell's book aims to make marriages stronger and create fewer divorces by bringing new awareness to men's plight. While it's aimed at men, there's nothing stopping women from picking up this book to learn more or buying for the man in their lives, says Farrell. "Give it to him with a note 'This helped me love you better' not 'You need this.' If the book doesn't work -- send it back and I'll refund the money."

- Tone of voice is more crucial than words.
- Don't complain too often.
- Never criticize someone who has just criticized you.
-Ask the listener to just "play listen."
- Try not to cross-examine the listener with questions

souirce: Calgary Sun

 

Qu'est-ce que le "black feminism" ?

 

Le triple mensonge féministe

 

Q&A: Political crisis in Lebanon