|
 |
La Gazette des gonzes
Content d'être un gars
Glad to be a
guy
 |
|
Séparons Féminisme
et État
fausse route
Mardi, le 3 juin 2008
Tuesday, June 3 2008 |
|
Hier |
Demain |
|
|

|
Les problématiques masculines
sont-elles dignes d’intérêt ?
|
|

|
1927 - The Christian Science Monitor (August
8) quoted from an address to the World Federation of Education
Associations (WFEA) by Dr. Augustus Thomas (commissioner of education
for Maine) at their Toronto congress: 'If there are those who think
we are to jump immediately into a new
world order, actuated by complete
understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment.'
He says the world must go through a long process of education '...until
the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the
people of all lands.'
|
Bazzo: une autre
masculiniste
 Lettres
à Marie-France Bazzo concernant ses invités du 6 décembre 2004
|
Mon
corps est un temple
|
Dear Ms. Ruddle,
Re:
Gender Violence
You
obviously want, as an activist for a feminist group, to maintain your job
status and income at CWF. You also want, and are required, to fulfill the
expectations imposed on you by like-minded feminists, contributors, and your
upper echelon — just like managers at all organizations and employers. (That's
why managers are not leaders as much as followers: they are followers of the
expectations of others. Which means they possess not power but responsibility.)
I
believe one of your main expectations — an unofficial one, an inwardly secret
one — is that you must always portray women as morally superior. This
centuries-old portrayal of women is akin to the centuries-old effort of men to
portray their sex as intellectually superior. Though this male effort has for
many years been rightly rejected by society, the female morally superior
effort is still tolerated, largely because of a chivalry that dove-tails
ideological feminists' protective stance toward women. (For several decades,
men have been pushed hard to revise their sexist views about women. The gender
reversal of this push is yet to register in our collective mind. Hence, a
knee-jerk, Duke-lacrosse-type of antimale mentality — which is almost
identical to the South's pre-1960s' animosity toward blacks — is still alive
and well, especially among ideological feminists, who ought to have learned
from our racist history.
How
does all this factor into gender violence? Mainly it has set the stage for
anyone to see this violence only as something men do to women. It gives
ideological feminists and many others permission to ignore evidence showing
that men are no worse than women in such areas as domestic violence, that both
sexes can be less than good role models.
Such evidence can be found in:
An Open Letter to the
Judiciary Committees on the Violence Against Women Act
"The
Mainstream Media Don’t Report Fairly On the Sexes’ Risk and Sacrifice in War"
"We
Often Have Different Responses To the Sexes For the Same Behavior"
As for verbal abuse being, as many feminists say, a form
of violence, here's a fresh example: “Caught on Tape: Indiana 5-year-old Says
He Recorded [female] Teacher Calling Him 'Pathetic'.” (See)
Hidden video cameras are increasingly catching females committing violent acts.
Please remember: Domestic violence is more prevalent in lesbian relationships
than in male/female relationships. (Ask Barbara Kay for the source.)
Please also remember: If we don't take women's violence and abuse as seriously
as we take men's, why should we take women's opinions as seriously as we take
men's? After all, according to ideological feminists' own -- and correct --
definition of hate crimes, violence is merely an opinion acted out, a view
transformed into behavior.
I've run out of time. I can't polish this to perfection. I may send a
better-written version to others at your group and to the publishers of your
commentaries -- for the balance they never seek and never get.
Sincerely,
Jerry A. Boggs
Male Matters
http://battlinbog.blog-city.com
|
la couleur de tes bobettes? no way!
En commentaire à la réaction de Madame
Evelyne Bertrand, au sujet de la campagne des P'tites culottes pour la paix.
Je comprends votre surprise vis à vis de
cette campagne, que je trouve moi-même pour le moins "originale". Cependant,
en lisant plus en détail sur celle-ci, on apprend qu'à l'origine, cette
campagne tire son thème d'une superstition locale, selon laquelle "...il
existe un tabou voulant que les hommes perdent leur pouvoir s’ils sont en
contact avec les vêtements que les femmes portent en dessous de la taille et
en particulier leurs petites culottes". (Source :
http://www.ptitesculottespourlapaix.ca/)
De plus, cette campagne a été pensée et
organisée par des femmes issue de cette communauté, pour qui ce thème prend
donc tout son sens en raison de sa référence locale.
Je ne suis ni décideuse et ne prend pas
parti sur le thème même de cette campagne, mais je pense que le fond,
davantage que la forme, doit retenir notre attention et notre soutien.
A défaut d'adhérer à cette initiative, nous
pouvons faire parvenir des lettres d'appui. Il n'y a pas qu'une façon de
s'engager et il faut concilier nos référents culturels aux objectifs plus
vastes qui sous-tendent toute action sociale. Mais je ne vous apprends sans
doute pas grand chose...
Bonne journée,
Mylène Beauregard
Féministe en mutation
|

|

|
Le diable est aux vaches
la couleur de tes bobettes? no
way!
Bonjour Evelyne et toutes les
NetFemmes,
Je voudrais clarifier qu'à
titre de modératrice de la liste NetFemmes, il est de mon ressort de décider
ce qui est diffusé sur la liste, parfois après consultation auprès de la
direction, de collègues ou de membres du CDÉACF.
S'il fallait "consulter tous
les membres de NetFemmes" à chaque fois qu'une soumission était faite à la
liste, nous ne ferions toutes que ça, débattre et décider de la pertinence de
tel message ou tel autre pour diffusion sur la
liste. Il revient à la modératrice de jouer ce rôle, justement, dans
l'intérêt des abonnées et en fonction des objectifs de la liste de
discussion.
Or, toutes les abonnées peuvent
bien sûr questionner ma décision de diffuser ou non un message ou un autre.
Dans le cas du message qui rapporte le lancement de la campagne "Soutenez les
femmes de Birmanie : envoyez vos P'tites culottes pour la paix !", je crois
avoir pris la bonne décision en l'approuvant.
Il s'agit d'une campagne
d'appui aux femmes de Birmanie menée par une coalition regroupant plusieurs
organisations féministes et issues de la société civile, coordonnée par la
Fédération des femmes du Québec (FFQ) et le Réseau étudiant Droits et
démocratie. Cette campagne avait été conçue par un groupe de femmes de
Birmanie, le Lanna Action for Burma.
Il s'agit donc d'une campagne
sérieuse et légitime, et la diffusion de son appel à l'action s'inscrit bien
dans le cadre des objectifs de la liste NetFemmes. D'où ma décision de
diffuser le communiqué de lancement de cette campagne.
Bonne journée,Katherine
Macnaughton-Osler
|
Sexual exploitation
occurs when youth under age 19 trade sexual activities with adults in exchange
for resources such as money, drugs, food, shelter, gifts, transportation or
other material considerations. It is illegal to sexually exploit minors,
regardless of their presumed or explicit consent.
Saewyc believes this
may be the largest study of sexually exploited youth in Canada. In a report
called It’s not what you think: Sexually exploited youth in British
Columbia, the research team describes the experiences of more than 500
sexually exploited youth from communities across B.C. The data were drawn from
five youth health surveys conducted by the Vancouver-based McCreary Centre
Society between 2000 and 2006 with street-involved youth and youth in custody.
Youth ranged in age from 12 to 25, but the majority of those surveyed were
under 19.
Aboriginal youth were
disproportionately among those who were sexually exploited. One-third to
one-half of exploited youth in any dataset identified as Aboriginal,
Lesbian, gay, and
bisexual teens were also more likely to be among the sexually exploited teens,
with 1 in 3 sexually exploited teens identifying as LGB. Just under half of
exploited teens identified as heterosexual. . “The study clearly shows that
teenagers belonging to sexual minority groups were the most at risk of sexual
abuse,” says Scientific Director Dr. Joy Johnson from the Canadian Institutes
of Health Research’s Institute of Gender and Health (CIHR-IGH). “The most
vulnerable teenagers in Canada seem to be the target, no matter their gender.”
One unexpected finding
was that women also sexually exploit adolescents. “The common stereotype is
it’s nearly always men who are exploiting youth, whether as pimps or as
‘Johns,’ the so-called clients who actually pay for sexual activity with money
or goods,” Saewyc said. “But among youth who told us the genders of the people
who exploit them, nearly half of the teens had exchanged sex with at least one
female. Indeed, nearly 1 in 3 youth had been exploited only by women, while
half of youth had been exploited solely by men.”
While many youth were
exploited for money or drugs, a significant number also exchanged sex for
basic necessities such as shelter, food, transportation or clothing. According
to Jayson Anderson, one of the study’s research associates who has worked with
exploited youth in Vancouver for several years, this survival sex isn’t always
recognized as exploitation by young people. To him, though, it’s a clear sign
services are not reaching some of the youth who most need them. “The UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child says children and youth are entitled to
safe shelter, food, and education in supportive communities. Teens shouldn’t
have to be exploited just so they can have a place to stay, or food to eat.”
The young people in
the surveys agreed. Sexually exploited youth felt their communities needed
more safe shelters, affordable housing, and job training and work experience
programs. Among older youth, more than 75% wanted to get a job, but fewer than
15% felt they could do so on their own. Despite their challenging lives,
sexually exploited youth reported typical hopes for the future, such as
getting a job, and having a home and family.
Other key findings
include:
- Among younger
street-involved youth (ages 12-18), a greater percentage of males were
exploited (33% vs. 24% females in 2000, 34% males vs. 27% of females in
2006). Among older street-involved youth (ages 19-25), a higher percentage
females reported sexual exploitation (53% females vs. 32% males in 2001).
- Among younger
street-involved youth, 1 in 5 were living at home when they were first
sexually exploited; females were more likely to be sexually exploited while
living with family than males were.
- However, for the
majority of street-involved youth, sexual exploitation came after
running away, being kicked out, or becoming street-involved; 3 out of 4
youth first left home at a younger age than first being sexually exploited.
- While youth were
most commonly exploited in exchange for money or drugs, they also exchanged
sex to meet their basic needs: More than 1 in 3 youth were exploited in
exchange for shelter, up to 1 in 4 for transportation, and up to 1 in 5 for
food or clothing.
- Exploited youth
were 2 to 3 times more likely to have seriously considered or attempted
suicide in the past year than non-exploited youth.
- The age of first
being exploited appears to have gotten slightly older between 2000 and 2006.
In 2000, the average age was 13.8 years, while in 2006 it was 14.8 years.
Funding for this study was provided
by CIHR’s Institute of Population and Public Health and CIHR’s
Institute of Gender and Health.
Some of the results
from this study will be presented at the Canadian Public Health Association
meeting in Halifax on June 3. The report will also be presented on June 5 in
Ottawa to the Committee Against the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children
and Youth, chaired by Senator Romeo
Dallaire.
A pdf copy of the
report may be downloaded at
http://www.nursing.ubc.ca/PDFs/ItsNotWhatYouThink.pdf
Research team members
are available for interviews:
Dr. Elizabeth Saewyc,
Principal Investigator
Jayson Anderson,
Community Research Associate
Dr. Laura MacKay,
Research Associate
Christopher Drozda,
Research Associate
The Canadian
Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) is the Government of Canada’s agency for
health research. CIHR’s mission is to create new scientific knowledge and to
catalyze its translation into improved health, more effective health services
and products, and a strengthened Canadian health-care system. Composed of 13
Institutes, CIHR provides leadership and support to more than 11,000 health
researchers and trainees across Canada.
www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca
|
Un
test de paternité révèle un scandale chez les gorilles du zoo de Bâle
|
Vous
pouvez faire circulez si vous voulez et c'est peut-être
quelque chose mettre sur le blog si ce n'est déja
fait. Je suis tombé sur le cul de rire en
entendant Paul Arcand dire sa connerie et Dupuis-Déry
d'en rajouter.
Je
résume si vous avez raté ce bout
là : Paul
Arcand parle avec Blais et Dupuis-Déry
à propos de leur livre. À un moment donné (environ
à la moitié du fichier audio) Arcand, qui pourtant n'a pas
été très complaisant
avec les deux bouffons, dit que les masculinistes
lui font "penser parfois à ceux
qui contestent la théorie de
l'holocauste" et Dupuis-Déry approuve la remarque en disant "oui
exactement. Les négationistes et les
révisionistes". ROFL!
Comment on dit en français? JMRPER? Je
me roule parterre en riant! C'est d'une
incroyable débilité, un moment de pure
comédie. Quand t'as pas
d'arguments tu sors de
ton chapeau l'épouvantail à la croix
gammée.
IMAGINONS LA SCÈNE
Dupuis-Déry: quoi?! vous contestez la cause féministe?!?
Gars normal: ben euh... c'est parce que...
Dupuis-Déry: Négateur de l'holocauste!!
NÉ-GA-TIO-NIS-TE!! Hey
regardez tout le monde ce gars là
conteste l'existence de l'holocauste!! NÉO-NAZI! FACHO!
la lecteur
audio du 98,5 FM
lien direct vers le fichier
mp3
|
|
Femmes violentes: le dernier tabou
|
|
Vous
pouvez faire circulez si vous voulez et c'est peut-être
quelque chose à mettre sur le blog si ce n'est
déja fait. Je suis tombé
sur le cul de rire en entendant Paul Arcand dire
sa connerie et Dupuis-Déry d'en rajouter.
Je
résume si vous avez raté
ce bout là : Paul Arcand parle avec Blais et
Dupuis-Déry à
propos de leur livre. À un moment donné
(environ à la moitié
du fichier audio) Arcand, qui pourtant n'a pas été
très complaisant avec les
deux bouffons, dit que les masculinistes lui font "penser parfois
à ceux qui contestent la théorie
de l'holocauste" et Dupuis-Déry
approuve la remarque en disant "oui exactement.
Les négationistes et les révisionistes".
ROFL! Comment on dit en français?
JMRPER? Je me roule parterre en riant! C'est d'une
incroyable débilité,
un moment de pure comédie. Quand t'as pas
d'arguments tu sors de ton chapeau l'épouvantail
à la croix gammée.
IMAGINONS LA SCÈNE
Dupuis-Déry: quoi?! vous contestez la cause féministe?!?
Gars normal: ben euh... c'est parce que...
Dupuis-Déry: Négateur
de l'holocauste!! NÉ-GA-TIO-NIS-TE!! Hey
regardez tout le monde ce gars là conteste
l'existence de l'holocauste!! NÉO-NAZI! FACHO!
la lecteur
audio du 98,5 FM
lien direct vers le fichier
mp3
|
Avez-vous vu ce reportage diffusé samedi
dernier à la SRC ?
Assumer sa paternité à l'adolescence :
Le reportage montre des exemples de jeunes pères (moins de 20 ans) qui
assument pleinement leur paternité. Vers la fin, on reproche le manque de
ressources destinées aux pères québécois et on dénonce la non-application
des recommandations du rapport Rondeau...
|
L'essence et l'existence
Le prix de l'essence nous gâche l'existence
|
Lawyers
urge 9/11 charges dismissal
|
|
|