Pourquoi les questions masculines sont-elles ignorées?

Des détails

Quelle est la nature de la relation qui existait entre Maryse Leclair et Marc Lépine? Pourquoi l'existence de cette relation a-t-elle toujours été occultée?

 

1934 - Experiment In Autobiography by H. G. Wells is published in which he states:  'The organization of this that I call the Open Conspiracy....which will ultimately supply teaching, coercive and directive public services to the whole world, is the immediate task before all rationale people...A planned world-state is appearing at a thousand points....Plans for political synthesis seem to grow bolder and more extensive....There must be a common faith and law for mankind....The main battle is an educational battle.

 

Tout, tout, tout. Elles ont tout inventé.

Des femmes à l’origine de l’art ?

 

Chérie pas ce soir

 

Ronflement

 

«J'ai des problèmes de couple»

 

L'art de se tirer dans le pied en tant que société

 

The Globe and Mail, Saturday, December  4, 1999
'When the snowflakes start to fall, we all remember'
DEC. 6, 1989
By Tu Thanh Ha and Ingrid Peritz

Shortly after 5 p.m. on the last day of classes before the Christmas holidays, a frantic call was sent to 911 dispatchers from the University of Montreal's engineering school, École Polytechnique. A man with an assault  weapon had entered the building. It was Marc Lépine, a 25-year-old loner who had a physically abusive father and had failed in his attempts to join the military and later to enroll at Polytechnique. He arrived at the school at 4 p.m. and spent 40 minutes sitting silently in the entrance to the registrar's office, occasionally rummaging through a green bag. He then left the office and headed into the university hallways. He entered a second-floor classroom, where he ordered the men to leave and declared that he hated feminists. He shot six women dead. He left the classroom and fired shots in the hallway, then passed an office and fired through the window, killing a secretary working in the school finance department. The gunman headed down to the cafeteria. He shot three more women, two of whom tried to hide behind a screen. He climbed the stairs to the third floor, entered another classroom and ordered everyone out. Someone asked whether it was a joke, and he replied by firing a warning shot. He then shot Maryse Leclair, who was making a presentation at the front of the class. Everyone dove for cover beneath their desks. He shot three more women.
 

As Ms. Leclair lay moaning, he pulled a knife from a sheath on his belt and stabbed her to death. He then sat down, said, "Oh shit," and fatally shot himself. The final death toll was 13 female engineering students and one office employee, with nine female and four male students wounded.

 

Mariage annulé : E. Badinter a "honte"

 

Hello Barbara,

I am an elected member of my children's school governing board (vice chairman), Saint-Monica elementary school in NDG, and I attend the monthly governing board meetings religiously to make sure I know what is happening in my children's "education life". I am also our school's regional representative for the monthly meetings at the school board, where we meet the other representatives of the schools in our area to discuss regional issues.

At last month's meeting (April) I was told that the school was having a "Denim day". So I innocently asked what this was all about. I was told that the children were encouraged to wear jeans to school (instead of their uniform pants) and to donate 2 dollars to the denim campaign for a breast cancer cure.

When I heard this, I carefully asked, the principal and teachers at the governing board meeting if this is sanctioned by the school board and how do they deal with all the other charities who will want to have equal access to this fund raising technique. As I finished my question, everyone went blank... like I was questioning the Bible or something. I was finally told that it was not officially sanctioned but that it was accepted and done annually. When I asked, what about fund raising for prostate cancer research the tension rose and then to lighten the air I ended the discussion by blurting out in a joking manner "don't get me wrong I like breasts too".

At this month's meeting (May) I was told that our school raised about 300 $ from about 250 children. If all of the 84 schools in the EMSB (the EMSB English Montreal School Board) raised this amount (most have more children than us) it would total 25,000 $. Now calculate this at a provincial or even national level. We are talking huge money! If we take a random number and say that there are 5,000 schools in Quebec it would mean about 1.5 million dollars in fund raising in a ONE day campaign!

What gives this charity the right to profit from this "delicate" form of fund raising over another?

I am stunned that the school boards, ours included, can accept to promote charities like this to young children. My daughter is 6 and in kinder garden, my son 9 and in grade 3. Neither of them understand what a breast is for, let alone the concept of breast cancer. At that age breasts and cancer are very abstract concepts. It seems to me this is inappropriate for this reason alone... and also for the simple reason that if we allow one charity to fund raise in our schools we have to allow them all.

Let me be clear... I am not against research into breast cancer (remember... I like breasts too). I am against promoting brands or causes to children who cannot decide for themselves and in most cases cannot even understand the concepts.

Due to my "recent experiences", I consider myself a bit biased. It is for this reason that I am writing you.

I am curious to know if anyone every looked into this?
If anyone has ever questioned this special privilege?
If anyone knows how much money they make every year thanks to this "soft" form of fund raising?
Are schools "taking a cut" of this?
Who gave them this special privilege?

... or am I being ridiculous to even bring this subject up?

Respectfully
Andy Srougi

 

Essence: les camionneurs britanniques au bord de la faillite

 

Pétrole: un espoir pour les automobilistes

 

Les pères contre-attaquent

 

 

Masculinisme vous dites?

 

Clinton wins, Obama closer to nomination

 

Washington cops getting semiautomatic rifles

 

J'espère que l'avenir soit plus rose pour nos gars, c'est même pas une blague:) Mais faut s'ajuster,faire des groupes de pressions comme les femino-faciste, passer des publicités,c'est sur que sans les millions que les gouvernements donnent aux facistes feministes c'est plus difficile, mais y'a sûrement moyen. C'est drôle mais  je vois pas de publicités du gouvernement qui parle que les vieillards et les enfants sont surtout battus par des femmes,c'est juste un peu drôle.

 

Voici la position officielle de l'Après-rupture suite à son analyse de la motion M 483.

 

Notre organisme  se joindra à une coalition d'organismes canadiens qui soutiennent M 483 par souci de solidarité.

 

Cependant, nous estimons que cette motion ne peut s'appliquer telle que formulée au Québec qui possède déjà son champ de compétence dans le domaine concerné. L'APRÈS-RUPTURE a toujours consacré ses énergies pour favoriser les relations pères-enfants au Québec et mettra tout en oeuvre pour y parvenir. 

Cordialement

Jean-Pierre gagnon

Recherche l'A-R

avec l'équipe

 

A country where we deny the truth and we promote lies

 

Cyclone victims 'forced from camps'